EZPZ vs. BITI
EZPZ (Franklin Crypto Index ETF) and BITI (ProShares Shrt Bitcoin ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - EZPZ tracks the CF Institutional Digital Asset Index – US-Settlement Price while BITI tracks the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EZPZ returned -42.21% vs 50.83% for BITI. At a correlation of -0.99, they often move in opposite directions. EZPZ charges 0.19%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BITI.
Performance
EZPZ vs. BITI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZPZ achieves a -34.43% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 33.96% return.
EZPZ
- 1D
- -6.18%
- 1M
- -26.82%
- YTD
- -34.43%
- 6M
- -36.79%
- 1Y
- -42.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITI
- 1D
- 5.14%
- 1M
- 33.94%
- YTD
- 33.96%
- 6M
- 36.50%
- 1Y
- 50.83%
- 3Y*
- -32.32%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZPZ vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF | -34.43% | -10.23% |
BITI ProShares Shrt Bitcoin ETF | 33.96% | 4.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZPZ and BITI is -0.99, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025 | -0.99 |
The correlation between EZPZ and BITI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.99 to -0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZPZ vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank
EZPZ
BITI
EZPZ vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) and ProShares Shrt Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EZPZ | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.21 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | 2.02 | -2.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.37 | 4.50 | -5.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EZPZ | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.90 | 1.17 | -2.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.71 | -0.70 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
EZPZ vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZPZ drawdown since its inception was -55.78%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZPZ and BITI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZPZ | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.78% | -92.16% | +36.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.78% | -25.28% | -30.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -84.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.78% | -85.37% | +29.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.92% | -67.99% | +46.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.82% | 11.80% | +19.02% |
Volatility
EZPZ vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) has a higher volatility of 10.69% compared to ProShares Shrt Bitcoin ETF (BITI) at 9.65%. This indicates that EZPZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZPZ | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.69% | 9.65% | +1.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.53% | 33.65% | +2.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.23% | 43.82% | +3.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.86% | 52.54% | -4.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.86% | 52.54% | -4.68% |
EZPZ vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZPZ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
EZPZ vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison
EZPZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BITI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.81%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITI ProShares Shrt Bitcoin ETF | 8.81% | 1.60% | 3.91% | 3.33% | 0.06% |
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EZPZ and BITI have a correlation of -0.99, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EZPZ has higher volatility (10.69%) compared to BITI (9.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZPZ dropped -55.78% vs BITI's -92.16%.
On 1-year performance, BITI leads with 50.83% vs -42.21% for EZPZ. On fees, EZPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, BITI has been the lower-risk option at 9.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BITI has performed better with a 50.83% return vs -42.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EZPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.
BITI has the higher dividend yield at 8.81%, compared with 0.00% for EZPZ.
EZPZ tracks CF Institutional Digital Asset Index – US-Settlement Price, while BITI tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for EZPZ and 1.03% for BITI.
BITI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EZPZ and BITI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer