EZPZ vs. ARKY
EZPZ (Franklin Crypto Index ETF) and ARKY (ARK 21Shares Active Bitcoin Ethereum Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. EZPZ is passively managed, while ARKY is actively managed. EZPZ charges 0.19%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for ARKY.
Performance
EZPZ vs. ARKY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EZPZ
- 1D
- -6.18%
- 1M
- -26.82%
- YTD
- -34.43%
- 6M
- -36.79%
- 1Y
- -42.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARKY
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZPZ vs. ARKY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF | -16.26% |
ARKY ARK 21Shares Active Bitcoin Ethereum Strategy ETF | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZPZ vs. ARKY — Risk / Return Rank
EZPZ
ARKY
EZPZ vs. ARKY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) and ARK 21Shares Active Bitcoin Ethereum Strategy ETF (ARKY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EZPZ | ARKY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.37 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EZPZ | ARKY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.71 | — | — |
Drawdowns
EZPZ vs. ARKY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZPZ drawdown since its inception was -55.78%, which is greater than ARKY's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZPZ and ARKY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZPZ | ARKY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.78% | 0.00% | -55.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.78% | 0.00% | -55.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.92% | 0.00% | -21.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.82% | — | — |
Volatility
EZPZ vs. ARKY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZPZ | ARKY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.69% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.53% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.23% | 0.00% | +47.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.86% | 0.00% | +47.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.86% | 0.00% | +47.86% |
EZPZ vs. ARKY - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZPZ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKY's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
EZPZ vs. ARKY - Dividend Comparison
Neither EZPZ nor ARKY has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, EZPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EZPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for ARKY.
EZPZ and ARKY have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for EZPZ and 1.00% for ARKY.
Find the right allocation for EZPZ and ARKY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer