EZM vs. VBR
EZM (WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund) and VBR (Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EZM is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Index, while VBR is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Small Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EZM returned 10.61%/yr vs 10.49%/yr for VBR. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EZM charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VBR.
Performance
EZM vs. VBR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZM achieves a 11.29% return, which is significantly lower than VBR's 12.51% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EZM having a 10.61% annualized return and VBR not far behind at 10.49%.
EZM
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 2.22%
- YTD
- 11.29%
- 6M
- 11.02%
- 1Y
- 24.69%
- 3Y*
- 16.06%
- 5Y*
- 8.11%
- 10Y*
- 10.61%
VBR
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 2.07%
- YTD
- 12.51%
- 6M
- 12.70%
- 1Y
- 27.37%
- 3Y*
- 17.22%
- 5Y*
- 8.12%
- 10Y*
- 10.49%
EZM vs. VBR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZM WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund | 11.29% | 8.42% | 10.29% | 19.69% | -12.22% | 31.00% | 5.57% | 24.48% | -12.36% | 17.37% |
VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 12.51% | 9.09% | 12.40% | 16.00% | -9.38% | 28.08% | 5.90% | 22.78% | -12.28% | 11.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZM and VBR is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2007 | 0.93 |
The correlation between EZM and VBR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
EZM vs. VBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EZM
VBR
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Financial Services
EZM
VBR
Industrials
EZM
VBR
Consumer Cyclical
EZM
VBR
Technology
EZM
VBR
Healthcare
EZM
VBR
Energy
EZM
VBR
Consumer Defensive
EZM
VBR
Real Estate
EZM
VBR
Basic Materials
EZM
VBR
Utilities
EZM
VBR
Communication Services
EZM
VBR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZM vs. VBR — Risk / Return Rank
EZM
VBR
EZM vs. VBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund (EZM) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EZM | VBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.32 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 3.11 | -0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.66 | 10.96 | -1.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EZM | VBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | 1.82 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.41 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.48 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.42 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
EZM vs. VBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZM drawdown since its inception was -59.58%, roughly equal to the maximum VBR drawdown of -61.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZM and VBR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZM | VBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.58% | -61.98% | +2.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.70% | -8.85% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.53% | -24.19% | +0.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.53% | -24.19% | +0.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.26% | -45.28% | -1.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.27% | -8.27% | 0.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.56% | 2.50% | +0.06% |
Volatility
EZM vs. VBR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund (EZM) is 3.33%, while Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) has a volatility of 3.89%. This indicates that EZM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZM | VBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.33% | 3.89% | -0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.25% | 10.47% | -0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.84% | 15.14% | -0.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.42% | 19.77% | +0.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.35% | 21.73% | +0.62% |
EZM vs. VBR - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZM has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than VBR's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
EZM vs. VBR - Dividend Comparison
EZM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than VBR's 1.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZM WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund | 1.25% | 1.39% | 1.22% | 1.25% | 1.57% | 1.08% | 1.67% | 1.34% | 1.57% | 1.14% | 1.55% | 1.30% |
VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 1.75% | 1.95% | 1.98% | 2.12% | 2.03% | 1.75% | 1.68% | 2.06% | 2.35% | 1.79% | 1.77% | 1.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, EZM and VBR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VBR has higher volatility (3.89%) compared to EZM (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZM dropped -59.58% vs VBR's -61.98%.
On 10-year performance, EZM leads with 10.61% vs 10.49% for VBR. On fees, VBR is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, EZM has been the lower-risk option at 3.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EZM has performed better with a 10.61% return vs 10.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VBR is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for EZM.
VBR has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 1.25% for EZM.
EZM is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VBR is Small Cap Value Equities. EZM tracks WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Index, while VBR tracks CRSP US Small Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for EZM and 0.05% for VBR.
VBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EZM and VBR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer