PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EZM vs. VBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EZM vs. VBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund (EZM) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZM achieves a 11.29% return, which is significantly lower than VBR's 12.51% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EZM having a 10.61% annualized return and VBR not far behind at 10.49%.


EZM

1D
0.68%
1M
2.22%
YTD
11.29%
6M
11.02%
1Y
24.69%
3Y*
16.06%
5Y*
8.11%
10Y*
10.61%

VBR

1D
0.76%
1M
2.07%
YTD
12.51%
6M
12.70%
1Y
27.37%
3Y*
17.22%
5Y*
8.12%
10Y*
10.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EZM vs. VBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EZM
WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund
11.29%8.42%10.29%19.69%-12.22%31.00%5.57%24.48%-12.36%17.37%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
12.51%9.09%12.40%16.00%-9.38%28.08%5.90%22.78%-12.28%11.81%

Correlation

The correlation between EZM and VBR is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2007

0.93

The correlation between EZM and VBR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

EZM vs. VBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EZM
VBR

Financial Services

19.3%
17.6%

Industrials

16.5%
18.1%

Consumer Cyclical

15.4%
12.4%

Technology

12.5%
10.6%

Healthcare

9.2%
7.9%

Energy

7.2%
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
4.0%

Real Estate

4.9%
10.1%

Basic Materials

4.4%
6.3%

Utilities

3.3%
4.8%

Communication Services

1.8%
2.5%

Financial Services

EZM
19.3%
VBR
17.6%

Industrials

EZM
16.5%
VBR
18.1%

Consumer Cyclical

EZM
15.4%
VBR
12.4%

Technology

EZM
12.5%
VBR
10.6%

Healthcare

EZM
9.2%
VBR
7.9%

Energy

EZM
7.2%
VBR
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

EZM
5.4%
VBR
4.0%

Real Estate

EZM
4.9%
VBR
10.1%

Basic Materials

EZM
4.4%
VBR
6.3%

Utilities

EZM
3.3%
VBR
4.8%

Communication Services

EZM
1.8%
VBR
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EZM vs. VBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZM
EZM Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
EZM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZM Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
EZM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZM Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

VBR
VBR Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
VBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBR Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
VBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBR Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EZM vs. VBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund (EZM) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EZMVBRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.32

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

3.11

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.66

10.96

-1.29

EZM vs. VBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EZM Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the VBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EZM and VBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EZMVBRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.67

1.82

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.41

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.48

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.42

-0.01

Drawdowns

EZM vs. VBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZM drawdown since its inception was -59.58%, roughly equal to the maximum VBR drawdown of -61.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZM and VBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EZMVBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.58%

-61.98%

+2.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.70%

-8.85%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.53%

-24.19%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.53%

-24.19%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.26%

-45.28%

-1.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.27%

-8.27%

0.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

2.50%

+0.06%

Volatility

EZM vs. VBR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund (EZM) is 3.33%, while Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) has a volatility of 3.89%. This indicates that EZM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EZMVBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

3.89%

-0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.25%

10.47%

-0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.84%

15.14%

-0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.42%

19.77%

+0.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.35%

21.73%

+0.62%

EZM vs. VBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

EZM has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than VBR's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

EZM vs. VBR - Dividend Comparison

EZM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than VBR's 1.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EZM
WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund
1.25%1.39%1.22%1.25%1.57%1.08%1.67%1.34%1.57%1.14%1.55%1.30%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
1.75%1.95%1.98%2.12%2.03%1.75%1.68%2.06%2.35%1.79%1.77%1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, EZM and VBR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VBR has higher volatility (3.89%) compared to EZM (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZM dropped -59.58% vs VBR's -61.98%.

On 10-year performance, EZM leads with 10.61% vs 10.49% for VBR. On fees, VBR is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, EZM has been the lower-risk option at 3.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EZM has performed better with a 10.61% return vs 10.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VBR is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for EZM.

VBR has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 1.25% for EZM.

EZM is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VBR is Small Cap Value Equities. EZM tracks WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Index, while VBR tracks CRSP US Small Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for EZM and 0.05% for VBR.

VBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EZM and VBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer