EZM vs. USMF
EZM (WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund) and USMF (WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds from WisdomTree - EZM tracks the WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Index while USMF tracks the WisdomTree US Multifactor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EZM returned 8.11%/yr vs 7.68%/yr for USMF. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EZM charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for USMF.
Performance
EZM vs. USMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZM achieves a 11.29% return, which is significantly higher than USMF's 4.43% return.
EZM
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 2.22%
- YTD
- 11.29%
- 6M
- 11.02%
- 1Y
- 24.69%
- 3Y*
- 16.06%
- 5Y*
- 8.11%
- 10Y*
- 10.61%
USMF
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 3.17%
- YTD
- 4.43%
- 6M
- 4.58%
- 1Y
- 6.68%
- 3Y*
- 14.35%
- 5Y*
- 7.68%
- 10Y*
- —
EZM vs. USMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZM WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund | 11.29% | 8.42% | 10.29% | 19.69% | -12.22% | 31.00% | 5.57% | 24.48% | -12.36% | 13.92% |
USMF WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund | 4.43% | 4.60% | 19.65% | 13.47% | -8.82% | 21.26% | 12.01% | 24.06% | -4.72% | 11.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZM and USMF is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2017 | 0.84 |
The correlation between EZM and USMF shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EZM vs. USMF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EZM
USMF
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Financial Services
EZM
USMF
Industrials
EZM
USMF
Consumer Cyclical
EZM
USMF
Technology
EZM
USMF
Healthcare
EZM
USMF
Energy
EZM
USMF
Consumer Defensive
EZM
USMF
Real Estate
EZM
USMF
Basic Materials
EZM
USMF
Utilities
EZM
USMF
Communication Services
EZM
USMF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZM vs. USMF — Risk / Return Rank
EZM
USMF
EZM vs. USMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund (EZM) and WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EZM | USMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.11 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 1.04 | +1.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.66 | 3.11 | +6.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EZM | USMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | 0.62 | +1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.54 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.63 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
EZM vs. USMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZM drawdown since its inception was -59.58%, which is greater than USMF's maximum drawdown of -36.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZM and USMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZM | USMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.58% | -36.24% | -23.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.70% | -6.47% | -2.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.53% | -15.39% | -8.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.53% | -18.10% | -5.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.49% | +0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.27% | -4.16% | -4.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.56% | 2.15% | +0.41% |
Volatility
EZM vs. USMF - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund (EZM) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF) at 2.25%. This indicates that EZM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZM | USMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.33% | 2.25% | +1.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.25% | 7.42% | +2.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.84% | 10.79% | +4.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.42% | 14.26% | +6.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.35% | 16.96% | +5.39% |
EZM vs. USMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZM has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than USMF's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
EZM vs. USMF - Dividend Comparison
EZM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than USMF's 1.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZM WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund | 1.25% | 1.39% | 1.22% | 1.25% | 1.57% | 1.08% | 1.67% | 1.34% | 1.57% | 1.14% | 1.55% | 1.30% |
USMF WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund | 1.31% | 1.37% | 1.22% | 1.33% | 1.74% | 1.42% | 1.34% | 1.38% | 1.45% | 0.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EZM and USMF have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EZM has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to USMF (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZM dropped -59.58% vs USMF's -36.24%.
On 5-year performance, EZM leads with 8.11% vs 7.68% for USMF. On fees, USMF is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, USMF has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EZM has performed better with a 8.11% return vs 7.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USMF is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for EZM.
USMF has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 1.25% for EZM.
EZM tracks WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Index, while USMF tracks WisdomTree US Multifactor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for EZM and 0.28% for USMF.
EZM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EZM and USMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer