EZM vs. PEXL
EZM (WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund) and PEXL (Pacer US Export Leaders ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - EZM tracks the WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Index while PEXL tracks the Pacer US Export Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EZM returned 8.11%/yr vs 13.04%/yr for PEXL. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EZM charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PEXL.
Performance
EZM vs. PEXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZM achieves a 11.29% return, which is significantly lower than PEXL's 21.98% return.
EZM
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 2.22%
- YTD
- 11.29%
- 6M
- 11.02%
- 1Y
- 24.69%
- 3Y*
- 16.06%
- 5Y*
- 8.11%
- 10Y*
- 10.61%
PEXL
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 9.34%
- YTD
- 21.98%
- 6M
- 23.37%
- 1Y
- 52.16%
- 3Y*
- 22.37%
- 5Y*
- 13.04%
- 10Y*
- —
EZM vs. PEXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZM WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund | 11.29% | 8.42% | 10.29% | 19.69% | -12.22% | 31.00% | 5.57% | 24.48% | -15.43% |
PEXL Pacer US Export Leaders ETF | 21.98% | 27.33% | 5.79% | 24.40% | -20.41% | 30.12% | 25.02% | 39.86% | -17.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZM and PEXL is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2018 | 0.82 |
The correlation between EZM and PEXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
EZM vs. PEXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EZM
PEXL
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Communication Services
Financial Services
EZM
PEXL
-
Industrials
EZM
PEXL
Consumer Cyclical
EZM
PEXL
Technology
EZM
PEXL
Healthcare
EZM
PEXL
Energy
EZM
PEXL
Consumer Defensive
EZM
PEXL
Real Estate
EZM
PEXL
-
Basic Materials
EZM
PEXL
Utilities
EZM
PEXL
-
Communication Services
EZM
PEXL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZM vs. PEXL — Risk / Return Rank
EZM
PEXL
EZM vs. PEXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund (EZM) and Pacer US Export Leaders ETF (PEXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EZM | PEXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.49 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 4.59 | -1.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.66 | 19.74 | -10.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EZM | PEXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | 2.95 | -1.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.60 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.65 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
EZM vs. PEXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZM drawdown since its inception was -59.58%, which is greater than PEXL's maximum drawdown of -36.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZM and PEXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZM | PEXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.58% | -36.76% | -22.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.70% | -11.43% | +2.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.53% | -24.72% | +1.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.53% | -30.44% | +6.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.92% | +0.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.27% | -6.72% | -1.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.56% | 2.65% | -0.09% |
Volatility
EZM vs. PEXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund (EZM) is 3.33%, while Pacer US Export Leaders ETF (PEXL) has a volatility of 5.31%. This indicates that EZM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PEXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZM | PEXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.33% | 5.31% | -1.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.25% | 13.14% | -2.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.84% | 17.79% | -2.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.42% | 21.86% | -1.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.35% | 24.04% | -1.69% |
EZM vs. PEXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZM has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than PEXL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
EZM vs. PEXL - Dividend Comparison
EZM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, more than PEXL's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZM WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund | 1.25% | 1.39% | 1.22% | 1.25% | 1.57% | 1.08% | 1.67% | 1.34% | 1.57% | 1.14% | 1.55% | 1.30% |
PEXL Pacer US Export Leaders ETF | 0.37% | 0.44% | 0.48% | 0.48% | 0.60% | 0.22% | 0.48% | 0.49% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EZM and PEXL have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PEXL has higher volatility (5.31%) compared to EZM (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZM dropped -59.58% vs PEXL's -36.76%.
On 5-year performance, PEXL leads with 13.04% vs 8.11% for EZM. On fees, EZM is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, EZM has been the lower-risk option at 3.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PEXL has performed better with a 13.04% return vs 8.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EZM is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PEXL.
EZM has the higher dividend yield at 1.25%, compared with 0.37% for PEXL.
EZM tracks WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Index, while PEXL tracks Pacer US Export Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for EZM and 0.60% for PEXL.
PEXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EZM and PEXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer