EZJ vs. USD
EZJ (ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan) and USD (ProShares Ultra Semiconductors) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - EZJ tracks the MSCI Japan Index (200%) while USD tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EZJ returned 10.56%/yr vs 61.24%/yr for USD. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
EZJ vs. USD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZJ achieves a 29.29% return, which is significantly lower than USD's 103.32% return. Over the past 10 years, EZJ has underperformed USD with an annualized return of 10.56%, while USD has yielded a comparatively higher 61.24% annualized return.
EZJ
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 10.56%
- YTD
- 29.29%
- 6M
- 28.96%
- 1Y
- 58.99%
- 3Y*
- 26.09%
- 5Y*
- 7.76%
- 10Y*
- 10.56%
USD
- 1D
- -4.99%
- 1M
- 31.62%
- YTD
- 103.32%
- 6M
- 97.79%
- 1Y
- 250.81%
- 3Y*
- 125.78%
- 5Y*
- 67.80%
- 10Y*
- 61.24%
EZJ vs. USD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZJ ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan | 29.29% | 42.72% | 3.31% | 30.78% | -38.23% | -1.96% | 22.21% | 33.76% | -30.99% | 49.10% |
USD ProShares Ultra Semiconductors | 103.32% | 62.08% | 139.64% | 228.79% | -68.57% | 104.27% | 68.16% | 110.37% | -26.88% | 81.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZJ and USD is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2009 | 0.49 |
The correlation between EZJ and USD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
EZJ vs. USD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EZJ
USD
Industrials
-
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Energy
Industrials
EZJ
USD
-
Technology
EZJ
USD
Financial Services
EZJ
USD
Consumer Cyclical
EZJ
USD
-
Communication Services
EZJ
USD
-
Healthcare
EZJ
USD
-
Consumer Defensive
EZJ
USD
-
Basic Materials
EZJ
USD
-
Real Estate
EZJ
USD
-
Utilities
EZJ
USD
-
Energy
EZJ
USD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZJ vs. USD — Risk / Return Rank
EZJ
USD
EZJ vs. USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) and ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EZJ | USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.48 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 7.94 | -5.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.79 | 22.96 | -16.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EZJ | USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49 | 4.12 | -2.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.89 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.89 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.49 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
EZJ vs. USD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZJ drawdown since its inception was -58.63%, smaller than the maximum USD drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZJ and USD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZJ | USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.63% | -88.63% | +30.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.78% | -31.80% | +5.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.48% | -64.46% | +32.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.63% | -77.85% | +19.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.63% | -77.85% | +19.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.87% | -6.07% | +2.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.28% | -32.35% | +11.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.72% | 10.98% | -2.26% |
Volatility
EZJ vs. USD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) is 8.46%, while ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD) has a volatility of 21.29%. This indicates that EZJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZJ | USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.46% | 21.29% | -12.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.74% | 46.74% | -16.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.67% | 61.28% | -21.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.58% | 76.56% | -39.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.53% | 69.24% | -34.71% |
EZJ vs. USD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EZJ and USD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
EZJ vs. USD - Dividend Comparison
EZJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, more than USD's 0.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZJ ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan | 1.60% | 1.13% | 2.09% | 1.11% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 4.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USD ProShares Ultra Semiconductors | 0.23% | 0.39% | 0.10% | 0.05% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.72% | 0.93% | 0.32% | 0.46% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EZJ and USD have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USD has higher volatility (21.29%) compared to EZJ (8.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZJ dropped -58.63% vs USD's -88.63%.
On 10-year performance, USD leads with 61.24% vs 10.56% for EZJ. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, EZJ has been the lower-risk option at 8.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, USD has performed better with a 61.24% return vs 10.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EZJ and USD have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
EZJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.60%, compared with 0.23% for USD.
EZJ tracks MSCI Japan Index (200%), while USD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (200%).
USD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.12 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EZJ and USD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer