EZJ vs. URE
EZJ (ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan) and URE (ProShares Ultra Real Estate) are both exchange-traded funds - EZJ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan Index (200%), while URE is a REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EZJ returned 11.13%/yr vs 3.72%/yr for URE. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
EZJ vs. URE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EZJ having a 24.65% return and URE slightly lower at 23.42%. Over the past 10 years, EZJ has outperformed URE with an annualized return of 11.13%, while URE has yielded a comparatively lower 3.72% annualized return.
EZJ
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- -1.93%
- YTD
- 24.65%
- 6M
- 23.79%
- 1Y
- 53.47%
- 3Y*
- 22.06%
- 5Y*
- 7.09%
- 10Y*
- 11.13%
URE
- 1D
- 1.83%
- 1M
- 4.44%
- YTD
- 23.42%
- 6M
- 23.42%
- 1Y
- 14.27%
- 3Y*
- 10.96%
- 5Y*
- -3.33%
- 10Y*
- 3.72%
EZJ vs. URE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZJ ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan | 24.65% | 42.72% | 3.31% | 30.78% | -38.23% | -1.96% | 22.21% | 33.76% | -30.99% | 49.10% |
URE ProShares Ultra Real Estate | 23.42% | -3.65% | 0.35% | 11.58% | -49.64% | 88.24% | -28.06% | 57.86% | -13.80% | 16.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZJ and URE is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2009 | 0.42 |
The correlation between EZJ and URE shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.43 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EZJ vs. URE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EZJ
URE
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Industrials
EZJ
URE
-
Technology
EZJ
URE
-
Financial Services
EZJ
URE
Consumer Cyclical
EZJ
URE
-
Communication Services
EZJ
URE
-
Healthcare
EZJ
URE
-
Consumer Defensive
EZJ
URE
-
Basic Materials
EZJ
URE
Real Estate
EZJ
URE
Utilities
EZJ
URE
-
Energy
EZJ
URE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZJ vs. URE — Risk / Return Rank
EZJ
URE
EZJ vs. URE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) and ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EZJ | URE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.11 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.01 | 0.87 | +1.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.06 | 2.09 | +3.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EZJ vs. URE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZJ drawdown since its inception was -58.63%, smaller than the maximum URE drawdown of -97.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZJ and URE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZJ | URE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.63% | -97.16% | +38.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.78% | -16.50% | -10.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.48% | -33.77% | +2.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.63% | -63.66% | +5.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.63% | -70.49% | +11.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.32% | -48.75% | +41.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.26% | -64.49% | +43.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.86% | 6.83% | +2.03% |
Volatility
EZJ vs. URE - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) has a higher volatility of 12.82% compared to ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE) at 9.54%. This indicates that EZJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZJ | URE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.82% | 9.54% | +3.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.61% | 20.35% | +12.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.13% | 27.52% | +13.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.89% | 37.38% | -0.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.65% | 40.58% | -5.93% |
EZJ vs. URE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EZJ and URE have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
EZJ vs. URE - Dividend Comparison
EZJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, less than URE's 1.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZJ ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan | 1.66% | 1.13% | 2.09% | 1.11% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 4.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
URE ProShares Ultra Real Estate | 1.90% | 2.42% | 2.09% | 1.32% | 1.26% | 0.58% | 0.94% | 1.10% | 1.53% | 0.93% | 0.96% | 0.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EZJ and URE have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EZJ has higher volatility (12.82%) compared to URE (9.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZJ dropped -58.63% vs URE's -97.16%.
On 10-year performance, EZJ leads with 11.13% vs 3.72% for URE. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, URE has been the lower-risk option at 9.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EZJ has performed better with a 11.13% return vs 3.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EZJ and URE have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
URE has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 1.66% for EZJ.
EZJ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while URE is REIT. EZJ tracks MSCI Japan Index (200%), while URE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (200%).
EZJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EZJ and URE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer