EZJ vs. QTAP

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EZJ (ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan) and QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) are both Leveraged Equities funds. EZJ is passively managed, while QTAP is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, EZJ returned 7.76%/yr vs 13.77%/yr for QTAP. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EZJ charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTAP.

Performance

EZJ vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZJ achieves a 29.29% return, which is significantly higher than QTAP's 14.58% return.

EZJ

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 10.56%
• YTD: 29.29%
• 6M: 28.96%
• 1Y: 58.99%
• 3Y*: 26.09%
• 5Y*: 7.76%
• 10Y*: 10.56%

QTAP

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 2.33%
• YTD: 14.58%
• 6M: 15.43%
• 1Y: 25.33%
• 3Y*: 21.09%
• 5Y*: 13.77%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EZJ vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EZJ ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan	29.29%	42.72%	3.31%	30.78%	-38.23%	-5.58%
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April	14.58%	19.36%	17.34%	43.32%	-25.87%	15.63%

Correlation

The correlation between EZJ and QTAP is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2021	0.57

The correlation between EZJ and QTAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

EZJ vs. QTAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EZJ	QTAP
Industrials	26.0%	3.3%
Technology	19.1%	50.7%
Financial Services	17.6%	0.2%
Consumer Cyclical	12.2%	12.5%
Communication Services	7.9%	15.8%
Healthcare	6.2%	5.1%
Consumer Defensive	3.6%	8.7%
Basic Materials	3.0%	1.3%
Real Estate	2.3%	0.1%
Utilities	1.1%	1.6%
Energy	1.1%	0.7%

Return for Risk

EZJ vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZJ

EZJ Risk / Return Rank: 43
EZJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
EZJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
EZJ Omega Ratio Rank: 43
EZJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
EZJ Martin Ratio Rank: 43

QTAP

QTAP Risk / Return Rank: 98
QTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
QTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 98
QTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
QTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EZJ vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EZJ	QTAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.49	4.57	-3.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.10	8.42	-6.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	2.21	-0.94
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.21	15.04	-12.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.79	79.40	-72.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EZJ vs. QTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EZJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the QTAP Sharpe Ratio of 4.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EZJ and QTAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EZJ	QTAP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.49	4.57	-3.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21	0.73	-0.52
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.31	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	0.75	-0.51

Drawdowns

EZJ vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZJ drawdown since its inception was -58.63%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZJ and QTAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	EZJ	QTAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.63%	-29.44%	-29.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.78%	-1.69%	-25.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.48%	-13.03%	-18.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-58.63%	-29.44%	-29.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.63%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.87%	-0.18%	-3.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.28%	-5.03%	-16.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.72%	0.32%	+8.40%

Volatility

EZJ vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) has a higher volatility of 8.46% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) at 1.30%. This indicates that EZJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EZJ	QTAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.46%	1.30%	+7.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.74%	3.98%	+26.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.67%	5.56%	+34.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.58%	18.88%	+17.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.53%	18.77%	+15.76%

EZJ vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

EZJ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

EZJ vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison

EZJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, while QTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EZJ ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan	1.60%	1.13%	2.09%	1.11%	0.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.24%	4.49%
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EZJ and QTAP in my portfolio?

EZJ and QTAP have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EZJ or QTAP?

EZJ has higher volatility (8.46%) compared to QTAP (1.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZJ dropped -58.63% vs QTAP's -29.44%.

Which ETF is better, EZJ or QTAP?

On 5-year performance, QTAP leads with 13.77% vs 7.76% for EZJ. On fees, QTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTAP has been the lower-risk option at 1.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EZJ or QTAP?

Over the 5-year period, QTAP has performed better with a 13.77% return vs 7.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EZJ or QTAP?

QTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EZJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EZJ or QTAP?

EZJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.60%, compared with 0.00% for QTAP.

What is the main difference between EZJ and QTAP?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EZJ and 0.79% for QTAP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.57 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.