EZJ vs. NEMG

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

EZJ (ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan) and NEMG (Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. EZJ is passively managed, while NEMG is actively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EZJ charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NEMG.

Performance

EZJ vs. NEMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) and Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF (NEMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZJ achieves a 27.24% return, which is significantly higher than NEMG's -24.50% return.

EZJ

• 1D: 1.48%
• 1M: 0.91%
• YTD: 27.24%
• 6M: 26.38%
• 1Y: 62.45%
• 3Y*: 26.61%
• 5Y*: 7.82%
• 10Y*: 11.65%

NEMG

• 1D: 3.21%
• 1M: -29.04%
• YTD: -24.50%
• 6M: -31.89%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EZJ vs. NEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EZJ ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan	27.24%	-1.28%
NEMG Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF	-24.50%	22.87%

Correlation

The correlation between EZJ and NEMG is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025	0.52

Return for Risk

EZJ vs. NEMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZJ

EZJ Risk / Return Rank: 49
EZJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
EZJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
EZJ Omega Ratio Rank: 48
EZJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
EZJ Martin Ratio Rank: 47

NEMG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EZJ vs. NEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) and Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF (NEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EZJ	NEMG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.49	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.04	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.34	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.04	—	—

Drawdowns

EZJ vs. NEMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZJ drawdown since its inception was -58.63%, roughly equal to the maximum NEMG drawdown of -57.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZJ and NEMG.

Drawdown Indicators

	EZJ	NEMG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.63%	-57.56%	-1.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.78%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.48%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-58.63%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.63%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.74%	-55.82%	+48.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.23%	-23.65%	+2.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.90%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EZJ	NEMG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.40%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.13%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.14%	102.58%	-60.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.14%	102.58%	-65.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.74%	102.58%	-67.84%

EZJ vs. NEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

EZJ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NEMG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

EZJ vs. NEMG - Dividend Comparison

EZJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, while NEMG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EZJ ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan	1.87%	1.13%	2.09%	1.11%	0.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.24%	4.49%
NEMG Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EZJ and NEMG in my portfolio?

EZJ and NEMG have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EZJ or NEMG?

On fees, NEMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EZJ or NEMG?

NEMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EZJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EZJ or NEMG?

EZJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 0.00% for NEMG.

What is the main difference between EZJ and NEMG?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EZJ and 0.75% for NEMG.