EZET vs. SETH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EZET (Franklin Ethereum ETF) and SETH (ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - EZET tracks the CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant while SETH tracks the Bloomberg Galaxy Ethereum (--100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EZET returned -31.70% vs -1.33% for SETH. At a correlation of -1.00, they often move in opposite directions. EZET charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SETH.

Performance

EZET vs. SETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) and ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZET achieves a -39.43% return, which is significantly lower than SETH's 40.93% return.

EZET

• 1D: -5.67%
• 1M: -23.67%
• YTD: -39.43%
• 6M: -42.74%
• 1Y: -31.70%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SETH

• 1D: 5.62%
• 1M: 29.74%
• YTD: 40.93%
• 6M: 46.51%
• 1Y: -1.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EZET vs. SETH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF	-39.43%	-11.23%	-3.68%
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF	40.93%	-29.41%	-13.35%

Correlation

The correlation between EZET and SETH is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024	-1.00

The correlation between EZET and SETH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -1.00 to -1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EZET vs. SETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZET

EZET Risk / Return Rank: 5
EZET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
EZET Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
EZET Omega Ratio Rank: 6
EZET Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
EZET Martin Ratio Rank: 5

SETH

SETH Risk / Return Rank: 10
SETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
SETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
SETH Omega Ratio Rank: 12
SETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
SETH Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EZET vs. SETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) and ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EZET	SETH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.47	-0.02	-0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.32	0.45	-0.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.05	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.51	-0.02	-0.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.84	-0.04	-0.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EZET vs. SETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EZET Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is lower than the SETH Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EZET and SETH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EZET	SETH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.47	-0.02	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.41	-0.45	+0.03

Drawdowns

EZET vs. SETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZET drawdown since its inception was -64.05%, smaller than the maximum SETH drawdown of -80.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZET and SETH.

Drawdown Indicators

	EZET	SETH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.05%	-80.74%	+16.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-62.87%	-56.01%	-6.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-62.87%	-61.29%	-1.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.67%	-54.79%	+22.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	37.73%	35.77%	+1.96%

Volatility

EZET vs. SETH - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) and ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH) have volatilities of 9.88% and 9.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EZET	SETH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.88%	9.81%	+0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.05%	46.07%	-0.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	68.43%	68.54%	-0.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	72.37%	69.53%	+2.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	72.37%	69.53%	+2.84%

EZET vs. SETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

EZET has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than SETH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

EZET vs. SETH - Dividend Comparison

EZET has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.91%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF	10.91%	7.01%	3.44%	0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EZET and SETH in my portfolio?

EZET and SETH have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EZET or SETH?

EZET has higher volatility (9.88%) compared to SETH (9.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZET dropped -64.05% vs SETH's -80.74%.

Which ETF is better, EZET or SETH?

On 1-year performance, SETH leads with -1.33% vs -31.70% for EZET. On fees, EZET is cheaper at 0.19% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EZET or SETH?

Over the 1-year period, SETH has performed better with a -1.33% return vs -31.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EZET or SETH?

EZET is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SETH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EZET or SETH?

SETH has the higher dividend yield at 10.91%, compared with 0.00% for EZET.

What is the main difference between EZET and SETH?

EZET tracks CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant, while SETH tracks Bloomberg Galaxy Ethereum (--100%). They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for EZET and 0.95% for SETH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SETH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.02 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.