QETH vs. SPHD
QETH (Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF) and SPHD (Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QETH is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Invesco, while SPHD is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index. QETH is actively managed, while SPHD is passively managed. Over the past year, QETH returned -32.58% vs 10.27% for SPHD. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QETH charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for SPHD.
Performance
QETH vs. SPHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QETH achieves a -40.24% return, which is significantly lower than SPHD's 5.63% return.
QETH
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- -25.22%
- YTD
- -40.24%
- 6M
- -43.56%
- 1Y
- -32.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPHD
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- 0.01%
- YTD
- 5.63%
- 6M
- 6.27%
- 1Y
- 10.27%
- 3Y*
- 11.98%
- 5Y*
- 5.73%
- 10Y*
- 7.17%
QETH vs. SPHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QETH Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF | -40.24% | -11.44% | -3.58% |
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF | 5.63% | 3.41% | 6.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between QETH and SPHD is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QETH vs. SPHD — Risk / Return Rank
QETH
SPHD
QETH vs. SPHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF (QETH) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QETH | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.16 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | 1.41 | -1.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.86 | 3.51 | -4.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QETH | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.48 | 0.93 | -1.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.42 | 0.58 | -1.01 |
Drawdowns
QETH vs. SPHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QETH drawdown since its inception was -64.07%, which is greater than SPHD's maximum drawdown of -41.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QETH and SPHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QETH | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.07% | -41.39% | -22.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.39% | -7.33% | -56.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.39% | -4.24% | -59.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.76% | -4.70% | -28.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.96% | 2.94% | +35.02% |
Volatility
QETH vs. SPHD - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF (QETH) has a higher volatility of 9.72% compared to Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) at 3.22%. This indicates that QETH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QETH | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.72% | 3.22% | +6.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.42% | 7.60% | +37.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.40% | 11.10% | +57.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.22% | 14.17% | +58.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.22% | 17.64% | +54.58% |
QETH vs. SPHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
QETH has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SPHD's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
QETH vs. SPHD - Dividend Comparison
QETH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QETH Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF | 4.57% | 4.02% | 3.41% | 4.48% | 3.89% | 3.45% | 4.89% | 4.07% | 4.40% | 3.14% | 3.83% | 3.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QETH and SPHD have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QETH has higher volatility (9.72%) compared to SPHD (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QETH dropped -64.07% vs SPHD's -41.39%.
On 1-year performance, SPHD leads with 10.27% vs -32.58% for QETH. On fees, QETH is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, SPHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SPHD has performed better with a 10.27% return vs -32.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QETH is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SPHD.
SPHD has the higher dividend yield at 4.57%, compared with 0.00% for QETH.
QETH is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while SPHD is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QETH and 0.30% for SPHD.
SPHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QETH and SPHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer