EZET vs. EZBC

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

EZET (Franklin Ethereum ETF) and EZBC (Franklin Bitcoin ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Franklin Templeton - EZET tracks the CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant while EZBC tracks the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EZET returned -49.07% vs -44.16% for EZBC. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. Both charge a 0.19% expense ratio.

Performance

EZET vs. EZBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZET achieves a -36.99% return, which is significantly lower than EZBC's -26.66% return.

EZET

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 10.09%
• 6M: -18.59%
• YTD: -36.99%
• 1Y: -49.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -26.66%

EZBC

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: 4.48%
• 6M: -16.02%
• YTD: -26.66%
• 1Y: -44.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF	$3.99M	$4.09M	$6.89M
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF	$400.33K	$484.91K	$668.91K

EZET vs. EZBC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF	-36.99%	-11.23%	-4.77%
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF	-26.66%	-6.56%	36.64%

Correlation

The correlation between EZET and EZBC is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024	0.82

The correlation between EZET and EZBC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EZET vs. EZBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EZET

EZET Risk / Return Rank: 3
EZET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
EZET Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
EZET Omega Ratio Rank: 3
EZET Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
EZET Martin Ratio Rank: 4

EZBC

EZBC Risk / Return Rank: 2
EZBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Omega Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EZET vs. EZBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EZET	EZBC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.74	-1.00	+0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.95	-1.47	+0.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	0.84	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.72	-0.83	+0.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.07	-1.27	+0.19

EZET vs. EZBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EZET Sharpe Ratio is -0.74, which is comparable to the EZBC Sharpe Ratio of -1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EZET and EZBC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EZET vs. EZBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZET drawdown since its inception was -67.89%, which is greater than EZBC's maximum drawdown of -53.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZET and EZBC.

Drawdown Indicators

	EZET	EZBC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.89%	-53.35%	-14.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-67.89%	-53.35%	-14.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-61.38%	-48.95%	-12.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.30%	-18.38%	-16.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	45.69%	34.92%	+10.77%

Volatility

EZET vs. EZBC - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) has a higher volatility of 11.10% compared to Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC) at 8.09%. This indicates that EZET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EZBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EZET	EZBC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.10%	8.09%	+3.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.45%	33.06%	+10.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	66.94%	44.31%	+22.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	71.19%	49.45%	+21.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	71.19%	49.45%	+21.74%

EZET vs. EZBC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EZET and EZBC have an expense ratio of 0.19%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

EZET vs. EZBC - Dividend Comparison

Neither EZET nor EZBC has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EZET and EZBC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, EZET and EZBC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, EZET or EZBC?

EZET has higher volatility (11.10%) compared to EZBC (8.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZET dropped -67.89% vs EZBC's -53.35%.

Which ETF is better, EZET or EZBC?

On 1-year performance, EZBC leads with -44.16% vs -49.07% for EZET. Both ETFs have the same 0.19% expense ratio. On volatility, EZBC has been the lower-risk option at 8.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EZET or EZBC?

Over the 1-year period, EZBC has performed better with a -44.16% return vs -49.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EZET or EZBC?

EZET and EZBC have the same expense ratio: 0.19% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EZET or EZBC?

EZET and EZBC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between EZET and EZBC?

EZET tracks CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant, while EZBC tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EZET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.74 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.