EZET vs. EHY

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) and Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF (EHY).

EZET and EHY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EZET is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant. It was launched on Jul 23, 2024. EHY is an actively managed fund by Amplify. It was launched on Oct 8, 2025.

Performance

EZET vs. EHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) and Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF (EHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EZET vs. EHY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF	-27.89%	-31.57%
EHY Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF	-25.41%	-25.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZET achieves a -27.89% return, which is significantly lower than EHY's -25.41% return.

EZET

• 1D: 2.14%
• 1M: 5.11%
• YTD: -27.89%
• 6M: -50.71%
• 1Y: 11.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EHY

• 1D: 2.24%
• 1M: 0.60%
• YTD: -25.41%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EZET vs. EHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

EZET has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than EHY's 0.75% expense ratio.

EHY

Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF

EZET

Franklin Ethereum ETF

Return for Risk

EZET vs. EHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZET

EZET Risk / Return Rank: 19
EZET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
EZET Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
EZET Omega Ratio Rank: 22
EZET Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
EZET Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EZET vs. EHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) and Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF (EHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EZET	EHY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.16	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.79	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.28	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.56	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EZET	EHY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.33	-1.14	+0.80

Correlation

The correlation between EZET and EHY is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

EZET vs. EHY - Dividend Comparison

EZET has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.33%.

	TTM	2025
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF	0.00%	0.00%
EHY Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF	28.33%	8.87%

Drawdowns

EZET vs. EHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZET drawdown since its inception was -64.05%, which is greater than EHY's maximum drawdown of -51.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZET and EHY.

Drawdown Indicators

	EZET	EHY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.05%	-51.48%	-12.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-61.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-55.80%	-44.58%	-11.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.49%	-30.01%	-0.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.61%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EZET	EHY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.05%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	53.59%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	75.83%	63.09%	+12.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	74.88%	63.09%	+11.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	74.88%	63.09%	+11.79%