PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EZA vs. TUR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EZA vs. TUR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI South Africa ETF (EZA) and iShares MSCI Turkey ETF (TUR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZA achieves a -2.56% return, which is significantly lower than TUR's 13.80% return. Over the past 10 years, EZA has outperformed TUR with an annualized return of 7.31%, while TUR has yielded a comparatively lower 2.47% annualized return.


EZA

1D
-2.20%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
-2.56%
6M
5.66%
1Y
34.67%
3Y*
26.60%
5Y*
8.78%
10Y*
7.31%

TUR

1D
-2.34%
1M
-6.69%
YTD
13.80%
6M
16.84%
1Y
30.29%
3Y*
10.24%
5Y*
14.80%
10Y*
2.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EZA vs. TUR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EZA
iShares MSCI South Africa ETF
-2.56%75.20%7.16%1.51%-5.18%7.91%-5.19%9.83%-25.24%36.03%
TUR
iShares MSCI Turkey ETF
13.80%-1.54%12.91%-8.83%105.75%-27.41%-1.19%14.49%-41.46%37.58%

Correlation

The correlation between EZA and TUR is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2008

0.51

The correlation between EZA and TUR shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (3 years) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EZA vs. TUR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EZA
TUR

Basic Materials

39.7%
11.5%

Financial Services

32.1%
15.3%

Consumer Cyclical

14.7%
5.0%

Communication Services

6.7%
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
13.7%

Real Estate

1.6%
1.2%

Industrials

1.5%
25.7%

Healthcare

1.2%
2.0%

Energy

-

6.2%

Technology

-

0.8%

Utilities

-

1.7%

Basic Materials

EZA
39.7%
TUR
11.5%

Financial Services

EZA
32.1%
TUR
15.3%

Consumer Cyclical

EZA
14.7%
TUR
5.0%

Communication Services

EZA
6.7%
TUR
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

EZA
2.4%
TUR
13.7%

Real Estate

EZA
1.6%
TUR
1.2%

Industrials

EZA
1.5%
TUR
25.7%

Healthcare

EZA
1.2%
TUR
2.0%

Energy

EZA

-

TUR
6.2%

Technology

EZA

-

TUR
0.8%

Utilities

EZA

-

TUR
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EZA vs. TUR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZA
EZA Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
EZA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZA Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
EZA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZA Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

TUR
TUR Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
TUR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TUR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
TUR Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
TUR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
TUR Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EZA vs. TUR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI South Africa ETF (EZA) and iShares MSCI Turkey ETF (TUR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EZATURDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.24

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

1.89

-0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.19

5.67

-1.48

EZA vs. TUR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EZA Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is comparable to the TUR Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EZA and TUR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EZATURDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12

1.20

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.44

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

0.07

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.04

+0.24

Drawdowns

EZA vs. TUR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZA drawdown since its inception was -64.64%, smaller than the maximum TUR drawdown of -72.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZA and TUR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EZATURDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.64%

-72.34%

+7.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.31%

-16.07%

-7.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.31%

-31.63%

+8.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.94%

-31.63%

-3.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.25%

-59.25%

-3.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.84%

-28.38%

+10.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.92%

-39.90%

+22.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.30%

5.36%

+2.94%

Volatility

EZA vs. TUR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI South Africa ETF (EZA) is 10.55%, while iShares MSCI Turkey ETF (TUR) has a volatility of 14.14%. This indicates that EZA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TUR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EZATURDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.55%

14.14%

-3.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.15%

19.90%

+6.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.03%

25.40%

+5.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.69%

34.16%

-5.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.37%

34.39%

-3.02%

EZA vs. TUR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EZA and TUR have an expense ratio of 0.59%.


Dividends

EZA vs. TUR - Dividend Comparison

EZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.32%, more than TUR's 2.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EZA
iShares MSCI South Africa ETF
6.32%6.16%7.26%2.84%3.90%2.05%5.51%12.27%3.81%1.55%4.10%3.03%
TUR
iShares MSCI Turkey ETF
2.11%2.40%1.79%4.43%1.97%4.22%0.87%3.29%4.05%2.64%2.89%3.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


EZA and TUR have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TUR has higher volatility (14.14%) compared to EZA (10.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZA dropped -64.64% vs TUR's -72.34%.

On 10-year performance, EZA leads with 7.31% vs 2.47% for TUR. Both ETFs have the same 0.59% expense ratio. On volatility, EZA has been the lower-risk option at 10.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EZA has performed better with a 7.31% return vs 2.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EZA and TUR have the same expense ratio: 0.59% per year.

EZA has the higher dividend yield at 6.32%, compared with 2.11% for TUR.

EZA tracks MSCI South Africa Index, while TUR tracks MSCI Turkey Investable Market Index.

TUR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EZA and TUR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer