EZA vs. SOXX
EZA (iShares MSCI South Africa ETF) and SOXX (iShares Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EZA is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI South Africa Index, while SOXX is a Semiconductors fund tracking the NYSE Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EZA returned 7.37%/yr vs 35.54%/yr for SOXX. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EZA charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for SOXX.
Performance
EZA vs. SOXX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZA achieves a -1.61% return, which is significantly lower than SOXX's 100.26% return. Over the past 10 years, EZA has underperformed SOXX with an annualized return of 7.37%, while SOXX has yielded a comparatively higher 35.54% annualized return.
EZA
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- -1.61%
- 6M
- 6.48%
- 1Y
- 35.13%
- 3Y*
- 26.68%
- 5Y*
- 8.99%
- 10Y*
- 7.37%
SOXX
- 1D
- -2.10%
- 1M
- 24.86%
- YTD
- 100.26%
- 6M
- 97.20%
- 1Y
- 179.78%
- 3Y*
- 57.09%
- 5Y*
- 33.93%
- 10Y*
- 35.54%
EZA vs. SOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZA iShares MSCI South Africa ETF | -1.61% | 75.20% | 7.16% | 1.51% | -5.18% | 7.91% | -5.19% | 9.83% | -25.24% | 36.03% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 100.26% | 40.74% | 12.92% | 67.12% | -35.09% | 44.09% | 52.72% | 62.42% | -6.49% | 39.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZA and SOXX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2003 | 0.48 |
EZA vs. SOXX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EZA
SOXX
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
EZA
SOXX
-
Financial Services
EZA
SOXX
-
Consumer Cyclical
EZA
SOXX
-
Communication Services
EZA
SOXX
-
Consumer Defensive
EZA
SOXX
-
Real Estate
EZA
SOXX
-
Industrials
EZA
SOXX
-
Healthcare
EZA
SOXX
-
Energy
EZA
-
SOXX
-
Technology
EZA
-
SOXX
Utilities
EZA
-
SOXX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZA vs. SOXX — Risk / Return Rank
EZA
SOXX
EZA vs. SOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI South Africa ETF (EZA) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EZA | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.71 | -0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | 11.48 | -9.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.21 | 43.90 | -39.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EZA | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 5.29 | -4.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.94 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | 1.07 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.44 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
EZA vs. SOXX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZA drawdown since its inception was -64.64%, smaller than the maximum SOXX drawdown of -70.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZA and SOXX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZA | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.64% | -70.21% | +5.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.31% | -15.77% | -7.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.31% | -41.36% | +18.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.94% | -45.75% | +10.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.25% | -45.75% | -16.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.05% | -2.10% | -14.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.92% | -19.97% | +3.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.37% | 4.11% | +4.26% |
Volatility
EZA vs. SOXX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI South Africa ETF (EZA) is 10.56%, while iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) has a volatility of 14.08%. This indicates that EZA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZA | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.56% | 14.08% | -3.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.12% | 27.45% | -1.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.03% | 34.20% | -3.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.69% | 36.11% | -7.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.37% | 33.43% | -2.06% |
EZA vs. SOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZA has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXX's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
EZA vs. SOXX - Dividend Comparison
EZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.26%, more than SOXX's 0.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZA iShares MSCI South Africa ETF | 6.26% | 6.16% | 7.26% | 2.84% | 3.90% | 2.05% | 5.51% | 12.27% | 3.81% | 1.55% | 4.10% | 3.03% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 0.28% | 0.57% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 1.26% | 0.64% | 0.81% | 1.23% | 1.37% | 0.90% | 1.08% | 1.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EZA and SOXX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXX has higher volatility (14.08%) compared to EZA (10.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZA dropped -64.64% vs SOXX's -70.21%.
On 10-year performance, SOXX leads with 35.54% vs 7.37% for EZA. On fees, SOXX is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, EZA has been the lower-risk option at 10.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SOXX has performed better with a 35.54% return vs 7.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXX is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EZA.
EZA has the higher dividend yield at 6.26%, compared with 0.28% for SOXX.
EZA is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SOXX is Semiconductors. EZA tracks MSCI South Africa Index, while SOXX tracks NYSE Semiconductor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EZA and 0.34% for SOXX.
SOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.29 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EZA and SOXX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer