PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EZA vs. SOXX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EZA vs. SOXX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI South Africa ETF (EZA) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZA achieves a -1.61% return, which is significantly lower than SOXX's 100.26% return. Over the past 10 years, EZA has underperformed SOXX with an annualized return of 7.37%, while SOXX has yielded a comparatively higher 35.54% annualized return.


EZA

1D
0.97%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
-1.61%
6M
6.48%
1Y
35.13%
3Y*
26.68%
5Y*
8.99%
10Y*
7.37%

SOXX

1D
-2.10%
1M
24.86%
YTD
100.26%
6M
97.20%
1Y
179.78%
3Y*
57.09%
5Y*
33.93%
10Y*
35.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EZA vs. SOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EZA
iShares MSCI South Africa ETF
-1.61%75.20%7.16%1.51%-5.18%7.91%-5.19%9.83%-25.24%36.03%
SOXX
iShares Semiconductor ETF
100.26%40.74%12.92%67.12%-35.09%44.09%52.72%62.42%-6.49%39.79%

Correlation

The correlation between EZA and SOXX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2003

0.48

EZA vs. SOXX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EZA
SOXX

Basic Materials

39.7%

-

Financial Services

32.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

14.7%

-

Communication Services

6.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.4%

-

Real Estate

1.6%

-

Industrials

1.5%

-

Healthcare

1.2%

-

Energy

-

-

Technology

-

100.0%

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

EZA
39.7%
SOXX

-

Financial Services

EZA
32.1%
SOXX

-

Consumer Cyclical

EZA
14.7%
SOXX

-

Communication Services

EZA
6.7%
SOXX

-

Consumer Defensive

EZA
2.4%
SOXX

-

Real Estate

EZA
1.6%
SOXX

-

Industrials

EZA
1.5%
SOXX

-

Healthcare

EZA
1.2%
SOXX

-

Energy

EZA

-

SOXX

-

Technology

EZA

-

SOXX
100.0%

Utilities

EZA

-

SOXX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EZA vs. SOXX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZA
EZA Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
EZA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZA Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
EZA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZA Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

SOXX
SOXX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SOXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOXX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
SOXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOXX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EZA vs. SOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI South Africa ETF (EZA) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EZASOXXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.71

-0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

11.48

-9.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.21

43.90

-39.69

EZA vs. SOXX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EZA Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the SOXX Sharpe Ratio of 5.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EZA and SOXX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EZASOXXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14

5.29

-4.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.94

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

1.07

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.44

-0.16

Drawdowns

EZA vs. SOXX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZA drawdown since its inception was -64.64%, smaller than the maximum SOXX drawdown of -70.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZA and SOXX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EZASOXXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.64%

-70.21%

+5.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.31%

-15.77%

-7.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.31%

-41.36%

+18.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.94%

-45.75%

+10.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.25%

-45.75%

-16.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.05%

-2.10%

-14.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.92%

-19.97%

+3.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.37%

4.11%

+4.26%

Volatility

EZA vs. SOXX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI South Africa ETF (EZA) is 10.56%, while iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) has a volatility of 14.08%. This indicates that EZA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EZASOXXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.56%

14.08%

-3.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.12%

27.45%

-1.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.03%

34.20%

-3.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.69%

36.11%

-7.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.37%

33.43%

-2.06%

EZA vs. SOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EZA has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXX's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

EZA vs. SOXX - Dividend Comparison

EZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.26%, more than SOXX's 0.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EZA
iShares MSCI South Africa ETF
6.26%6.16%7.26%2.84%3.90%2.05%5.51%12.27%3.81%1.55%4.10%3.03%
SOXX
iShares Semiconductor ETF
0.28%0.57%0.67%0.78%1.26%0.64%0.81%1.23%1.37%0.90%1.08%1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


EZA and SOXX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOXX has higher volatility (14.08%) compared to EZA (10.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZA dropped -64.64% vs SOXX's -70.21%.

On 10-year performance, SOXX leads with 35.54% vs 7.37% for EZA. On fees, SOXX is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, EZA has been the lower-risk option at 10.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SOXX has performed better with a 35.54% return vs 7.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SOXX is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EZA.

EZA has the higher dividend yield at 6.26%, compared with 0.28% for SOXX.

EZA is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SOXX is Semiconductors. EZA tracks MSCI South Africa Index, while SOXX tracks NYSE Semiconductor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EZA and 0.34% for SOXX.

SOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.29 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EZA and SOXX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer