PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EZA vs. LEER.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EZA vs. LEER.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI South Africa ETF (EZA) and Amundi MSCI Eastern Europe Ex Russia UCITS ETF (LEER.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EZA is traded in USD, while LEER.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LEER.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZA achieves a -2.81% return, which is significantly lower than LEER.DE's 18.09% return. Over the past 10 years, EZA has underperformed LEER.DE with an annualized return of 8.12%, while LEER.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.04% annualized return.


EZA

1D
0.89%
1M
-5.51%
YTD
-2.81%
6M
2.77%
1Y
30.30%
3Y*
23.45%
5Y*
9.50%
10Y*
8.12%

LEER.DE

1D
3.06%
1M
3.72%
YTD
18.09%
6M
22.55%
1Y
46.01%
3Y*
34.68%
5Y*
16.12%
10Y*
12.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EZA vs. LEER.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EZA
iShares MSCI South Africa ETF
-2.81%75.20%7.16%1.51%-5.18%7.91%-5.19%9.83%-25.24%36.03%
LEER.DE
Amundi MSCI Eastern Europe Ex Russia UCITS ETF
18.09%73.79%-1.82%46.19%-25.52%10.91%-10.44%-0.84%-12.68%49.06%

Correlation

The correlation between EZA and LEER.DE is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008

0.46

The correlation between EZA and LEER.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (all time) to 0.56 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EZA vs. LEER.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZA
EZA Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
EZA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZA Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
EZA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZA Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

LEER.DE
LEER.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
LEER.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEER.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEER.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
LEER.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEER.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EZA vs. LEER.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI South Africa ETF (EZA) and Amundi MSCI Eastern Europe Ex Russia UCITS ETF (LEER.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EZALEER.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.34

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.31

3.85

-2.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.41

10.97

-7.56

EZA vs. LEER.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EZA Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the LEER.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EZA and LEER.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EZA vs. LEER.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZA drawdown since its inception was -64.64%, smaller than the maximum LEER.DE drawdown of -74.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZA and LEER.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EZALEER.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.64%

-74.69%

+10.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.31%

-11.89%

-11.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.31%

-17.69%

-5.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.94%

-52.31%

+17.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.25%

-59.03%

-3.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.05%

-0.91%

-17.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.92%

-42.79%

+25.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.93%

4.18%

+4.75%

Volatility

EZA vs. LEER.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI South Africa ETF (EZA) has a higher volatility of 11.34% compared to Amundi MSCI Eastern Europe Ex Russia UCITS ETF (LEER.DE) at 7.49%. This indicates that EZA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LEER.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EZALEER.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.34%

7.49%

+3.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.03%

19.12%

+7.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.92%

23.07%

+8.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.86%

26.24%

+2.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.43%

24.36%

+7.07%

EZA vs. LEER.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EZA has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than LEER.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

EZA vs. LEER.DE - Dividend Comparison

EZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.34%, while LEER.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EZA
iShares MSCI South Africa ETF
6.34%6.16%7.26%2.84%3.90%2.05%5.51%12.27%3.81%1.55%4.10%3.03%
LEER.DE
Amundi MSCI Eastern Europe Ex Russia UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EZA and LEER.DE have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LEER.DE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LEER.DE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EZA.

EZA tracks MSCI South Africa Index, while LEER.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Eastern Europe ex Russia Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EZA and 0.50% for LEER.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EZA and LEER.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer