PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EZA vs. BTC-USD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EZA vs. BTC-USD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI South Africa ETF (EZA) and Bitcoin (BTC-USD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZA achieves a -2.81% return, which is significantly higher than BTC-USD's -26.27% return. Over the past 10 years, EZA has underperformed BTC-USD with an annualized return of 8.12%, while BTC-USD has yielded a comparatively higher 57.23% annualized return.


EZA

1D
0.89%
1M
-5.12%
YTD
-2.81%
6M
2.77%
1Y
33.90%
3Y*
23.45%
5Y*
9.50%
10Y*
8.12%

BTC-USD

1D
1.71%
1M
-20.43%
YTD
-26.27%
6M
-28.52%
1Y
-39.20%
3Y*
36.94%
5Y*
9.74%
10Y*
57.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EZA vs. BTC-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EZA
iShares MSCI South Africa ETF
-2.81%75.20%7.16%1.51%-5.18%7.91%-5.19%9.83%-25.24%36.03%
BTC-USD
Bitcoin
-26.27%-6.27%120.76%155.82%-64.23%59.40%304.57%94.10%-73.37%1,324.24%

Correlation

The correlation between EZA and BTC-USD is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2012

0.08

Over the past year, EZA and BTC-USD have become more correlated (0.30) than their long-term average of 0.08, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EZA vs. BTC-USD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZA
EZA Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
EZA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZA Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
EZA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZA Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

BTC-USD
BTC-USD Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
BTC-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTC-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTC-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
BTC-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTC-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EZA vs. BTC-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI South Africa ETF (EZA) and Bitcoin (BTC-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EZABTC-USDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

0.87

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.31

-0.77

+2.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.41

-1.33

+4.74

EZA vs. BTC-USD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EZA Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is higher than the BTC-USD Sharpe Ratio of -0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EZA and BTC-USD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EZA vs. BTC-USD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZA drawdown since its inception was -64.64%, smaller than the maximum BTC-USD drawdown of -85.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZA and BTC-USD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EZABTC-USDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.64%

-85.30%

+20.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.31%

-51.21%

+27.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.31%

-51.21%

+27.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.94%

-76.67%

+41.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.25%

-83.80%

+21.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.05%

-48.27%

+30.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.92%

-42.36%

+25.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.93%

35.16%

-26.23%

Volatility

EZA vs. BTC-USD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI South Africa ETF (EZA) is 11.34%, while Bitcoin (BTC-USD) has a volatility of 11.97%. This indicates that EZA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTC-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EZABTC-USDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.34%

11.97%

-0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.03%

34.64%

-7.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.92%

35.59%

-3.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.86%

44.57%

-15.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.43%

56.61%

-25.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


EZA and BTC-USD have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BTC-USD has higher volatility (11.97%) compared to EZA (11.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZA dropped -64.64% vs BTC-USD's -85.30%.

EZA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EZA and BTC-USD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer