PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EYEG vs. NYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EYEG vs. NYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Corporate Bond ETF (EYEG) and AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF (NYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EYEG achieves a -1.02% return, which is significantly lower than NYM's 0.73% return.


EYEG

1D
-0.16%
1M
-1.82%
6M
-1.30%
YTD
-1.02%
1Y
1.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.13%

NYM

1D
-0.06%
1M
-0.98%
6M
0.11%
YTD
0.73%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$8.83K$6.17K$6.63K
$1.37M$1.39M$1.99M

EYEG vs. NYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
EYEG
AB Corporate Bond ETF
-1.02%0.37%
NYM
AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF
0.73%0.47%

Correlation

The correlation between EYEG and NYM is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2025

0.54

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EYEG vs. NYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EYEG
EYEG Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
EYEG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EYEG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
EYEG Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
EYEG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
EYEG Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

NYM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EYEG vs. NYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Corporate Bond ETF (EYEG) and AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF (NYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EYEGNYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.92

EYEG vs. NYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EYEG vs. NYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EYEG drawdown since its inception was -4.66%, which is greater than NYM's maximum drawdown of -1.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EYEG and NYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EYEGNYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.66%

-1.76%

-2.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.32%

-1.09%

-1.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.24%

-0.40%

-0.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.10%

Volatility

EYEG vs. NYM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EYEGNYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.30%

2.01%

+2.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.40%

2.01%

+3.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.40%

2.01%

+3.39%

EYEG vs. NYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EYEG has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than NYM's 0.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

EYEG vs. NYM - Dividend Comparison

EYEG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.01%, more than NYM's 1.99% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
EYEG
AB Corporate Bond ETF
4.58%4.94%6.07%0.25%
NYM
AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF
1.99%0.49%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EYEG and NYM have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NYM is cheaper at 0.27% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NYM is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EYEG.

EYEG has the higher dividend yield at 4.58%, compared with 1.99% for NYM.

EYEG is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while NYM is Municipal Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EYEG and 0.27% for NYM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EYEG and NYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer