EYEG vs. ILOW
EYEG (AB Corporate Bond ETF) and ILOW (AB International Low Volatility Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EYEG is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while ILOW is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EYEG returned 5.83% vs 11.03% for ILOW. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EYEG charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for ILOW.
Performance
EYEG vs. ILOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EYEG achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than ILOW's 4.82% return.
EYEG
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 0.37%
- 6M
- 0.15%
- 1Y
- 5.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ILOW
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 1.39%
- YTD
- 4.82%
- 6M
- 6.86%
- 1Y
- 11.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EYEG vs. ILOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EYEG AB Corporate Bond ETF | 0.37% | 7.42% | 1.24% |
ILOW AB International Low Volatility Equity ETF | 4.82% | 26.99% | -1.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between EYEG and ILOW is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2024 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EYEG vs. ILOW — Risk / Return Rank
EYEG
ILOW
EYEG vs. ILOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Corporate Bond ETF (EYEG) and AB International Low Volatility Equity ETF (ILOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EYEG | ILOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.15 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.06 | 1.13 | +0.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.03 | 4.40 | +1.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EYEG | ILOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | 0.83 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 1.07 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
EYEG vs. ILOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EYEG drawdown since its inception was -4.66%, smaller than the maximum ILOW drawdown of -10.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EYEG and ILOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EYEG | ILOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.66% | -10.37% | +5.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.84% | -9.80% | +6.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.94% | -2.08% | +1.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.25% | -2.11% | +0.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.97% | 2.51% | -1.54% |
Volatility
EYEG vs. ILOW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AB Corporate Bond ETF (EYEG) is 1.41%, while AB International Low Volatility Equity ETF (ILOW) has a volatility of 4.47%. This indicates that EYEG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ILOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EYEG | ILOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.41% | 4.47% | -3.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.17% | 11.12% | -7.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.36% | 13.42% | -9.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.47% | 14.56% | -9.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.47% | 14.56% | -9.09% |
EYEG vs. ILOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
EYEG has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than ILOW's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
EYEG vs. ILOW - Dividend Comparison
EYEG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.94%, more than ILOW's 1.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EYEG AB Corporate Bond ETF | 4.94% | 4.94% | 6.07% | 0.25% |
ILOW AB International Low Volatility Equity ETF | 1.53% | 1.60% | 0.78% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EYEG and ILOW have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ILOW has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to EYEG (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EYEG dropped -4.66% vs ILOW's -10.37%.
On 1-year performance, ILOW leads with 11.03% vs 5.83% for EYEG. On fees, EYEG is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, EYEG has been the lower-risk option at 1.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ILOW has performed better with a 11.03% return vs 5.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EYEG is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for ILOW.
EYEG has the higher dividend yield at 4.94%, compared with 1.53% for ILOW.
EYEG is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while ILOW is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EYEG and 0.50% for ILOW.
EYEG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EYEG and ILOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer