PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EYED.L vs. MLPD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EYED.L vs. MLPD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EYED.L) and Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EYED.L is traded in GBP, while MLPD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MLPD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EYED.L achieves a 34.28% return, which is significantly higher than MLPD.L's 19.18% return.


EYED.L

1D
-1.18%
1M
-2.75%
YTD
34.28%
6M
30.34%
1Y
58.34%
3Y*
17.65%
5Y*
10Y*

MLPD.L

1D
-0.57%
1M
0.78%
YTD
19.18%
6M
13.75%
1Y
16.82%
3Y*
15.85%
5Y*
18.55%
10Y*
7.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EYED.L vs. MLPD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
EYED.L
iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
34.28%20.20%-10.02%5.93%5.36%
MLPD.L
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)
19.18%-4.96%24.67%13.71%-7.27%

Correlation

The correlation between EYED.L and MLPD.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2022

0.54

The correlation between EYED.L and MLPD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

EYED.L vs. MLPD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EYED.L
MLPD.L

Energy

99.2%
96.7%

Communication Services

0.8%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

0.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

3.2%

Energy

EYED.L
99.2%
MLPD.L
96.7%

Communication Services

EYED.L
0.8%
MLPD.L

-

Basic Materials

EYED.L

-

MLPD.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

EYED.L

-

MLPD.L

-

Consumer Defensive

EYED.L

-

MLPD.L

-

Financial Services

EYED.L

-

MLPD.L

-

Healthcare

EYED.L

-

MLPD.L

-

Industrials

EYED.L

-

MLPD.L
0.2%

Real Estate

EYED.L

-

MLPD.L

-

Technology

EYED.L

-

MLPD.L

-

Utilities

EYED.L

-

MLPD.L
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EYED.L vs. MLPD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EYED.L
EYED.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
EYED.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EYED.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
EYED.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
EYED.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
EYED.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

MLPD.L
MLPD.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
MLPD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EYED.L vs. MLPD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EYED.L) and Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EYED.LMLPD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.18

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.79

1.78

+3.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.52

4.22

+10.30

EYED.L vs. MLPD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EYED.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is higher than the MLPD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EYED.L and MLPD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EYED.LMLPD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60

1.05

+1.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.19

+0.48

Drawdowns

EYED.L vs. MLPD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EYED.L drawdown since its inception was -25.34%, smaller than the maximum MLPD.L drawdown of -75.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EYED.L and MLPD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EYED.LMLPD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.34%

-75.45%

+50.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.12%

-9.39%

-2.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.34%

-19.01%

-6.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.53%

-3.40%

-4.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.26%

-20.17%

+11.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.01%

3.98%

+0.03%

Volatility

EYED.L vs. MLPD.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EYED.L) has a higher volatility of 8.43% compared to Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L) at 6.01%. This indicates that EYED.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLPD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EYED.LMLPD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.43%

6.01%

+2.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.97%

12.35%

+6.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.35%

15.99%

+6.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.02%

20.26%

+0.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.02%

28.17%

-7.15%

EYED.L vs. MLPD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EYED.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPD.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

EYED.L vs. MLPD.L - Dividend Comparison

EYED.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, less than MLPD.L's 7.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EYED.L
iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
3.87%5.09%5.79%5.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MLPD.L
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)
7.57%8.21%8.18%8.60%7.98%8.57%11.03%10.06%9.87%8.15%8.14%9.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


EYED.L and MLPD.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EYED.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EYED.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MLPD.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EYED.L and 0.50% for MLPD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EYED.L and MLPD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer