EXXX.DE vs. AMED.DE
EXXX.DE (iShares ATX UCITS ETF (DE)) and AMED.DE (Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C)) are both Europe Equities funds - EXXX.DE tracks the ATX Index while AMED.DE tracks the MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EXXX.DE returned 17.65%/yr vs 11.22%/yr for AMED.DE. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EXXX.DE charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AMED.DE.
Performance
EXXX.DE vs. AMED.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EXXX.DE achieves a 26.40% return, which is significantly higher than AMED.DE's 21.48% return.
EXXX.DE
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- 8.32%
- 6M
- 25.26%
- YTD
- 26.40%
- 1Y
- 51.78%
- 3Y*
- 31.33%
- 5Y*
- 17.65%
- 10Y*
- 15.61%
AMED.DE
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 4.47%
- 6M
- 20.74%
- YTD
- 21.48%
- 1Y
- 32.17%
- 3Y*
- 16.74%
- 5Y*
- 11.22%
- 10Y*
- —
EXXX.DE vs. AMED.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXXX.DE iShares ATX UCITS ETF (DE) | 26.40% | 51.31% | 10.39% | 13.71% | -16.43% | 42.16% | -11.27% | 19.95% | -18.96% | 1.55% |
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 21.48% | 20.15% | 5.95% | 16.68% | -10.71% | 20.90% | -1.35% | 27.22% | -12.98% | -1.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between EXXX.DE and AMED.DE is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2017 | 0.75 |
The correlation between EXXX.DE and AMED.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EXXX.DE vs. AMED.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EXXX.DE
AMED.DE
EXXX.DE vs. AMED.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ATX UCITS ETF (DE) (EXXX.DE) and Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EXXX.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.39 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.81 | 3.03 | +1.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.27 | 11.69 | +4.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EXXX.DE vs. AMED.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EXXX.DE drawdown since its inception was -71.43%, which is greater than AMED.DE's maximum drawdown of -38.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXXX.DE and AMED.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EXXX.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.43% | -38.35% | -33.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.71% | -10.56% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.11% | -14.07% | -2.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.69% | -24.06% | -8.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | 0.00% | -0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.46% | -5.59% | -22.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | 2.75% | +0.42% |
Volatility
EXXX.DE vs. AMED.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares ATX UCITS ETF (DE) (EXXX.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.95% compared to Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) at 3.37%. This indicates that EXXX.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMED.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EXXX.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.95% | 3.37% | +2.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.44% | 12.92% | +1.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.43% | 15.17% | +2.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.15% | 15.88% | +3.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.00% | 17.35% | +2.65% |
EXXX.DE vs. AMED.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EXXX.DE has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than AMED.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
EXXX.DE vs. AMED.DE - Dividend Comparison
EXXX.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%, while AMED.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EXXX.DE iShares ATX UCITS ETF (DE) | 2.92% | 2.53% | 4.30% | 3.53% | 3.61% | 1.04% | 1.18% | 1.73% | 0.48% | 0.65% | 1.08% | 1.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EXXX.DE and AMED.DE have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMED.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMED.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for EXXX.DE.
EXXX.DE tracks ATX Index, while AMED.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for EXXX.DE and 0.25% for AMED.DE.
Find the right allocation for EXXX.DE and AMED.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer