PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EXXT.DE vs. AAPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

EXXT.DE vs. AAPL

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EXXT.DE (iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (DE)) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100®, while AAPL (Apple Inc) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, EXXT.DE returned 21.13%/yr vs 29.75%/yr for AAPL. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

EXXT.DE vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXXT.DE) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EXXT.DE is traded in EUR, while AAPL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AAPL values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EXXT.DE achieves a 20.57% return, which is significantly higher than AAPL's 15.71% return. Over the past 10 years, EXXT.DE has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 21.13%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 29.75% annualized return.

EXXT.DE

1D
-0.82%
1M
9.30%
YTD
20.57%
6M
19.41%
1Y
37.71%
3Y*
24.48%
5Y*
18.61%
10Y*
21.13%

AAPL

1D
0.00%
1M
10.07%
YTD
15.71%
6M
11.10%
1Y
51.09%
3Y*
17.37%
5Y*
21.52%
10Y*
29.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EXXT.DE vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EXXT.DE
iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (DE)		20.57%6.87%33.51%51.27%-30.11%39.07%34.53%42.79%2.90%15.46%
AAPL
Apple Inc		16.00%-3.89%39.33%44.54%-21.84%44.72%67.28%93.23%-0.95%30.22%

Correlation

The correlation between EXXT.DE and AAPL is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2007

0.44

The correlation between EXXT.DE and AAPL shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.47 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (DE)

Apple Inc

Often compared with EXXT.DE:
EXXT.DE vs. CNDX.ASEXXT.DE vs. SXR8.DEEXXT.DE vs. EQQQ.LEXXT.DE vs. SXRV.DEEXXT.DE vs. IS3R.DEEXXT.DE vs. QQQEXXT.DE vs. SPY
Often compared with AAPL:
AAPL vs. MSFTAAPL vs. NVDAAAPL vs. SPYAAPL vs. GOOGAAPL vs. TSLAAAPL vs. AMZNAAPL vs. VOO

Return for Risk

EXXT.DE vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
EXXT.DE
EXXT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
EXXT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXXT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXXT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
EXXT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXXT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
AAPL
AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EXXT.DE vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXXT.DE) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

EXXT.DEAAPLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.38
2.27

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.16
3.12

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.41

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.73

3.46

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.05

8.78

+2.27

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EXXT.DE vs. AAPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EXXT.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXXT.DE and AAPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

EXXT.DEAAPLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

2.27

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.79

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.07

1.02

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.86

-0.08

Drawdowns

EXXT.DE vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXXT.DE drawdown since its inception was -46.75%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -56.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXXT.DE and AAPL.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

EXXT.DEAAPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.75%

-56.08%

+9.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.08%

-14.83%

+4.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.62%

-36.63%

+10.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.39%

-36.63%

+5.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.39%

-38.03%

+6.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

-1.35%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.74%

-12.28%

+4.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

5.83%

-2.43%

Volatility

EXXT.DE vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXXT.DE) is 4.28%, while Apple Inc (AAPL) has a volatility of 5.06%. This indicates that EXXT.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

EXXT.DEAAPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.28%

5.06%

-0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.97%

16.17%

-5.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.78%

22.60%

-6.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.90%

27.28%

-7.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.70%

29.23%

-9.53%

Dividends

EXXT.DE vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

EXXT.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than AAPL's 0.34% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAPL
Apple Inc		0.34%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
EXXT.DE
iShares Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF (DE)		0.15%0.19%0.26%0.53%0.41%0.15%0.32%0.40%0.28%1.84%0.84%0.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

EXXT.DE and AAPL have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EXXT.DE and AAPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer