EXUS vs. UMMA

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

EXUS (Macquarie Focused International Core ETF) and UMMA (Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past year, EXUS returned 8.62% vs 49.17% for UMMA. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EXUS charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for UMMA.

Performance

EXUS vs. UMMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Macquarie Focused International Core ETF (EXUS) and Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EXUS achieves a 7.16% return, which is significantly lower than UMMA's 30.40% return.

EXUS

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 2.35%
• YTD: 7.16%
• 6M: 7.61%
• 1Y: 8.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UMMA

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: 5.16%
• YTD: 30.40%
• 6M: 30.71%
• 1Y: 49.17%
• 3Y*: 22.19%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EXUS vs. UMMA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EXUS Macquarie Focused International Core ETF	7.16%	3.87%
UMMA Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF	30.40%	15.77%

Correlation

The correlation between EXUS and UMMA is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025	0.82

The correlation between EXUS and UMMA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EXUS vs. UMMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EXUS

EXUS Risk / Return Rank: 16
EXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
EXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
EXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 16
EXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
EXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 19

UMMA

UMMA Risk / Return Rank: 73
UMMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
UMMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
UMMA Omega Ratio Rank: 74
UMMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
UMMA Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EXUS vs. UMMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Macquarie Focused International Core ETF (EXUS) and Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EXUS	UMMA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.46	2.18	-1.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.76	2.81	-2.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.39	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.57	3.31	-2.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.00	12.63	-10.63

EXUS vs. UMMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EXUS Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the UMMA Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXUS and UMMA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EXUS vs. UMMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXUS drawdown since its inception was -15.28%, smaller than the maximum UMMA drawdown of -34.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXUS and UMMA.

Drawdown Indicators

	EXUS	UMMA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.28%	-34.17%	+18.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.28%	-14.93%	-0.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.50%	-4.42%	+0.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.99%	-9.73%	+6.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.32%	3.90%	+0.42%

Volatility

EXUS vs. UMMA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Macquarie Focused International Core ETF (EXUS) is 7.93%, while Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA) has a volatility of 12.07%. This indicates that EXUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UMMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EXUS	UMMA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.93%	12.07%	-4.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.85%	20.30%	-3.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.18%	22.74%	-3.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.10%	21.08%	-1.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.10%	21.08%	-1.98%

EXUS vs. UMMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

EXUS has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than UMMA's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

EXUS vs. UMMA - Dividend Comparison

EXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than UMMA's 0.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
EXUS Macquarie Focused International Core ETF	0.03%	0.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UMMA Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF	0.94%	1.02%	0.91%	1.09%	1.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EXUS and UMMA in my portfolio?

EXUS and UMMA have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EXUS or UMMA?

UMMA has higher volatility (12.07%) compared to EXUS (7.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EXUS dropped -15.28% vs UMMA's -34.17%.

Which ETF is better, EXUS or UMMA?

On 1-year performance, UMMA leads with 49.17% vs 8.62% for EXUS. On fees, EXUS is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, EXUS has been the lower-risk option at 7.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EXUS or UMMA?

Over the 1-year period, UMMA has performed better with a 49.17% return vs 8.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EXUS or UMMA?

EXUS is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for UMMA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EXUS or UMMA?

UMMA has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.03% for EXUS.

What is the main difference between EXUS and UMMA?

They also come from different issuers: Macquarie and Wahed. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EXUS and 0.65% for UMMA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UMMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.