PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EXUS vs. AGGG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EXUS vs. AGGG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Macquarie Focused International Core ETF (EXUS) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (AGGG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EXUS achieves a 8.02% return, which is significantly higher than AGGG.L's -2.67% return.


EXUS

1D
-1.71%
1M
-0.12%
6M
3.85%
YTD
8.02%
1Y
9.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AGGG.L

1D
-0.22%
1M
-1.12%
6M
-0.67%
YTD
-2.67%
1Y
-0.51%
3Y*
2.03%
5Y*
-2.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EXUS vs. AGGG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EXUS and AGGG.L is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EXUS vs. AGGG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EXUS
EXUS Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
EXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
EXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

AGGG.L
AGGG.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
AGGG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGGG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGGG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
AGGG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGGG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EXUS vs. AGGG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Macquarie Focused International Core ETF (EXUS) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (AGGG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EXUSAGGG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

0.99

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.61

-0.14

+0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.13

-0.32

+2.45

EXUS vs. AGGG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EXUS Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is higher than the AGGG.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXUS and AGGG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EXUS vs. AGGG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXUS drawdown since its inception was -15.28%, smaller than the maximum AGGG.L drawdown of -26.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXUS and AGGG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EXUSAGGG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.28%

-26.00%

+10.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.28%

-3.56%

-11.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.73%

-13.18%

+10.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.92%

-9.57%

+6.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.33%

1.60%

+2.73%

Volatility

EXUS vs. AGGG.L - Volatility Comparison

Macquarie Focused International Core ETF (EXUS) has a higher volatility of 6.49% compared to iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (AGGG.L) at 1.28%. This indicates that EXUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGGG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EXUSAGGG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.49%

1.28%

+5.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.25%

4.25%

+13.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.37%

5.53%

+13.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.11%

7.02%

+12.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.11%

6.43%

+12.68%

EXUS vs. AGGG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EXUS has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than AGGG.L's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

EXUS vs. AGGG.L - Dividend Comparison

EXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than AGGG.L's 3.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AGGG.L
iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
3.21%2.97%2.74%2.01%1.55%1.33%1.46%1.62%0.96%
EXUS
Macquarie Focused International Core ETF
0.03%0.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EXUS and AGGG.L have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AGGG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AGGG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EXUS.

EXUS is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while AGGG.L is Global Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Macquarie and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EXUS and 0.10% for AGGG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EXUS and AGGG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer