PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EXOSX vs. QFVOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EXOSX vs. QFVOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Manning & Napier Overseas Series (EXOSX) and Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund (QFVOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EXOSX achieves a 6.35% return, which is significantly lower than QFVOX's 21.28% return. Over the past 10 years, EXOSX has underperformed QFVOX with an annualized return of 7.72%, while QFVOX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.51% annualized return.


EXOSX

1D
-0.73%
1M
1.87%
6M
3.51%
YTD
6.35%
1Y
13.02%
3Y*
9.93%
5Y*
2.59%
10Y*
7.72%
ALL TIME*
7.15%

QFVOX

1D
1.71%
1M
3.79%
6M
13.92%
YTD
21.28%
1Y
39.79%
3Y*
19.09%
5Y*
11.83%
10Y*
10.51%
ALL TIME*
7.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

EXOSX vs. QFVOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EXOSX
Manning & Napier Overseas Series
6.35%16.21%3.33%19.89%-24.26%11.50%27.07%27.52%-17.23%23.92%
QFVOX
Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund
21.28%33.85%-0.70%19.88%-17.14%19.44%2.65%17.93%-13.28%25.24%

Correlation

The correlation between EXOSX and QFVOX is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2002

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between EXOSX and QFVOX has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EXOSX vs. QFVOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EXOSX
EXOSX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
EXOSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXOSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXOSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
EXOSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXOSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

QFVOX
QFVOX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
QFVOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QFVOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
QFVOX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
QFVOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
QFVOX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EXOSX vs. QFVOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Overseas Series (EXOSX) and Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund (QFVOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EXOSXQFVOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.47

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.08

3.54

-2.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.76

12.57

-8.81

EXOSX vs. QFVOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EXOSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the QFVOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXOSX and QFVOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EXOSX vs. QFVOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXOSX drawdown since its inception was -55.50%, smaller than the maximum QFVOX drawdown of -70.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXOSX and QFVOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EXOSXQFVOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.50%

-70.51%

+15.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.77%

-11.02%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.91%

-14.92%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.71%

-32.90%

-4.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.71%

-45.52%

+7.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

0.00%

-0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.00%

-15.22%

+4.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.36%

3.09%

+0.27%

Volatility

EXOSX vs. QFVOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Manning & Napier Overseas Series (EXOSX) is 4.07%, while Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund (QFVOX) has a volatility of 4.42%. This indicates that EXOSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QFVOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EXOSXQFVOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.07%

4.42%

-0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.40%

13.92%

-1.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.84%

15.51%

-0.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.81%

15.59%

+1.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.55%

16.37%

+0.18%

EXOSX vs. QFVOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EXOSX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than QFVOX's 1.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

EXOSX vs. QFVOX - Dividend Comparison

EXOSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, less than QFVOX's 4.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EXOSX
Manning & Napier Overseas Series
1.07%1.13%1.29%1.27%0.82%1.85%0.86%1.72%0.91%1.79%1.71%1.84%
QFVOX
Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund
4.66%5.66%1.95%1.88%1.43%10.11%1.58%1.14%0.98%0.60%1.02%1.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


EXOSX and QFVOX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QFVOX has higher volatility (4.42%) compared to EXOSX (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EXOSX dropped -55.50% vs QFVOX's -70.51%.

QFVOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EXOSX and QFVOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer