EXOSX vs. FIGSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier Overseas Series (EXOSX) and Fidelity Series International Growth Fund (FIGSX).
EXOSX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Jul 9, 2002. FIGSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 3, 2009.
Performance
EXOSX vs. FIGSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EXOSX vs. FIGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXOSX Manning & Napier Overseas Series | -7.05% | 16.21% | 3.33% | 19.89% | -24.26% | 11.50% | 27.07% | 27.52% | -17.23% | 23.92% |
FIGSX Fidelity Series International Growth Fund | -5.60% | 19.12% | 5.93% | 21.74% | -22.87% | 16.61% | 18.52% | 35.59% | -10.97% | 30.21% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EXOSX achieves a -7.05% return, which is significantly lower than FIGSX's -5.60% return. Over the past 10 years, EXOSX has underperformed FIGSX with an annualized return of 6.47%, while FIGSX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.19% annualized return.
EXOSX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -9.74%
- YTD
- -7.05%
- 6M
- -6.01%
- 1Y
- 3.66%
- 3Y*
- 6.53%
- 5Y*
- 1.56%
- 10Y*
- 6.47%
FIGSX
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -13.35%
- YTD
- -5.60%
- 6M
- -5.08%
- 1Y
- 9.99%
- 3Y*
- 9.41%
- 5Y*
- 5.27%
- 10Y*
- 9.19%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EXOSX vs. FIGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EXOSX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FIGSX's 0.01% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EXOSX vs. FIGSX — Risk / Return Rank
EXOSX
FIGSX
EXOSX vs. FIGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Overseas Series (EXOSX) and Fidelity Series International Growth Fund (FIGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EXOSX | FIGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.17 | 0.50 | -0.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.35 | 0.82 | -0.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.11 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.15 | 0.58 | -0.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.56 | 2.33 | -1.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EXOSX | FIGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 | 0.50 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | 0.30 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.53 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.47 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between EXOSX and FIGSX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EXOSX vs. FIGSX - Dividend Comparison
EXOSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, less than FIGSX's 9.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXOSX Manning & Napier Overseas Series | 1.22% | 1.13% | 1.29% | 1.27% | 0.82% | 1.85% | 0.86% | 1.72% | 0.91% | 1.79% | 1.71% | 1.84% |
FIGSX Fidelity Series International Growth Fund | 9.19% | 8.67% | 4.29% | 1.27% | 3.53% | 8.33% | 16.24% | 3.64% | 7.47% | 3.14% | 2.54% | 3.54% |
Drawdowns
EXOSX vs. FIGSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EXOSX drawdown since its inception was -55.50%, which is greater than FIGSX's maximum drawdown of -34.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXOSX and FIGSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EXOSX | FIGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.50% | -34.47% | -21.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.77% | -13.89% | +2.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.71% | -34.47% | -3.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.71% | -34.47% | -3.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.38% | -13.89% | +2.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.12% | -6.49% | -4.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 3.48% | -0.43% |
Volatility
EXOSX vs. FIGSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Manning & Napier Overseas Series (EXOSX) is 5.78%, while Fidelity Series International Growth Fund (FIGSX) has a volatility of 8.00%. This indicates that EXOSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EXOSX | FIGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.78% | 8.00% | -2.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.88% | 12.68% | -2.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.27% | 18.90% | -2.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.51% | 17.53% | -1.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.59% | 17.50% | -0.91% |