EXOSX vs. FAOSX
EXOSX (Manning & Napier Overseas Series) and FAOSX (Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, EXOSX returned 1.61%/yr vs 3.61%/yr for FAOSX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EXOSX charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for FAOSX.
Performance
EXOSX vs. FAOSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EXOSX
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 1.16%
- YTD
- 1.36%
- 6M
- 2.10%
- 1Y
- 5.23%
- 3Y*
- 8.82%
- 5Y*
- 1.61%
- 10Y*
- 7.34%
FAOSX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- -2.15%
- 3Y*
- 8.88%
- 5Y*
- 3.61%
- 10Y*
- —
EXOSX vs. FAOSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXOSX Manning & Napier Overseas Series | 1.36% | 16.21% | 3.33% | 19.89% | -24.26% | 11.50% | 27.07% | 27.52% | -17.23% | 19.55% |
FAOSX Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z | 0.00% | 15.36% | 5.06% | 20.52% | -24.31% | 19.42% | 15.17% | 27.96% | -14.73% | 26.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between EXOSX and FAOSX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017 | 0.87 |
Over the past year, the correlation between EXOSX and FAOSX has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EXOSX vs. FAOSX — Risk / Return Rank
EXOSX
FAOSX
EXOSX vs. FAOSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Overseas Series (EXOSX) and Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z (FAOSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EXOSX | FAOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 0.97 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.54 | -0.26 | +0.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.86 | -0.44 | +2.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EXOSX | FAOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 | -0.20 | +0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.22 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.50 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
EXOSX vs. FAOSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EXOSX drawdown since its inception was -55.50%, which is greater than FAOSX's maximum drawdown of -36.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXOSX and FAOSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EXOSX | FAOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.50% | -36.24% | -19.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.77% | -7.26% | -4.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.91% | -13.96% | -0.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.71% | -36.24% | -1.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.36% | -5.86% | +2.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.07% | -7.93% | -3.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.39% | 3.98% | -0.59% |
Volatility
EXOSX vs. FAOSX - Volatility Comparison
Manning & Napier Overseas Series (EXOSX) has a higher volatility of 4.23% compared to Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z (FAOSX) at 0.00%. This indicates that EXOSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAOSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EXOSX | FAOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.23% | 0.00% | +4.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.30% | 3.98% | +7.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.10% | 9.14% | +4.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.68% | 16.71% | -0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.69% | 16.68% | +0.01% |
EXOSX vs. FAOSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EXOSX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than FAOSX's 1.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
EXOSX vs. FAOSX - Dividend Comparison
EXOSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than FAOSX's 8.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXOSX Manning & Napier Overseas Series | 1.12% | 1.13% | 1.29% | 1.27% | 0.82% | 1.85% | 0.86% | 1.72% | 0.91% | 1.79% | 1.71% | 1.84% |
FAOSX Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z | 8.67% | 8.67% | 1.80% | 1.12% | 0.85% | 2.07% | 0.00% | 1.70% | 5.30% | 3.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EXOSX and FAOSX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EXOSX has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to FAOSX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EXOSX dropped -55.50% vs FAOSX's -36.24%.
EXOSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.45 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EXOSX and FAOSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer