PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EXI2.DE vs. NADQ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EXI2.DE vs. NADQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Dow Jones Global Titans 50 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXI2.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist (NADQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EXI2.DE achieves a 12.23% return, which is significantly lower than NADQ.DE's 20.63% return. Over the past 10 years, EXI2.DE has underperformed NADQ.DE with an annualized return of 16.14%, while NADQ.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 21.45% annualized return.


EXI2.DE

1D
-0.27%
1M
5.25%
YTD
12.23%
6M
12.47%
1Y
34.12%
3Y*
22.85%
5Y*
17.19%
10Y*
16.14%

NADQ.DE

1D
-0.86%
1M
9.24%
YTD
20.63%
6M
19.44%
1Y
38.00%
3Y*
24.74%
5Y*
18.92%
10Y*
21.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EXI2.DE vs. NADQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EXI2.DE
iShares Dow Jones Global Titans 50 UCITS ETF (DE)
12.23%10.38%38.84%33.44%-21.53%35.62%10.63%35.14%-0.86%6.38%
NADQ.DE
Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist
20.63%7.04%34.07%51.46%-29.91%39.75%34.72%43.03%3.29%15.73%

Correlation

The correlation between EXI2.DE and NADQ.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2008

0.85

The correlation between EXI2.DE and NADQ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EXI2.DE vs. NADQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EXI2.DE
EXI2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
EXI2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXI2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXI2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
EXI2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXI2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

NADQ.DE
NADQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
NADQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NADQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
NADQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
NADQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
NADQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EXI2.DE vs. NADQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Dow Jones Global Titans 50 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXI2.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist (NADQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EXI2.DENADQ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.42

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.21

3.79

+0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.84

11.32

+4.52

EXI2.DE vs. NADQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EXI2.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the NADQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXI2.DE and NADQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EXI2.DENADQ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

2.40

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

0.94

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

1.11

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.97

-0.56

Drawdowns

EXI2.DE vs. NADQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXI2.DE drawdown since its inception was -59.21%, which is greater than NADQ.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXI2.DE and NADQ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EXI2.DENADQ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.21%

-33.44%

-25.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.07%

-9.97%

+1.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.75%

-26.70%

+1.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.75%

-31.16%

+6.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.00%

-31.16%

+1.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-0.86%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.44%

-5.93%

-11.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

3.35%

-1.20%

Volatility

EXI2.DE vs. NADQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Dow Jones Global Titans 50 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXI2.DE) is 3.46%, while Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist (NADQ.DE) has a volatility of 4.26%. This indicates that EXI2.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NADQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EXI2.DENADQ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

4.26%

-0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.18%

10.95%

-1.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.50%

15.74%

-2.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.60%

19.84%

-3.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.57%

19.54%

-2.97%

EXI2.DE vs. NADQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EXI2.DE has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than NADQ.DE's 0.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

EXI2.DE vs. NADQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

EXI2.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, which matches NADQ.DE's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EXI2.DE
iShares Dow Jones Global Titans 50 UCITS ETF (DE)
0.33%0.41%0.42%0.61%0.84%0.55%0.99%1.28%1.29%2.56%1.77%2.56%
NADQ.DE
Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist
0.33%0.40%0.55%0.40%0.79%0.51%0.40%0.54%0.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, EXI2.DE and NADQ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, NADQ.DE is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NADQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for EXI2.DE.

EXI2.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while NADQ.DE is Nasdaq-100. EXI2.DE tracks Dow Jones Global Titans 50, while NADQ.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for EXI2.DE and 0.22% for NADQ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EXI2.DE and NADQ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer