PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EXG vs. EEIAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EXG vs. EEIAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Diversified Equity Income Fund (EXG) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund (EEIAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EXG achieves a 3.51% return, which is significantly lower than EEIAX's 4.30% return. Over the past 10 years, EXG has outperformed EEIAX with an annualized return of 10.92%, while EEIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.94% annualized return.


EXG

1D
-0.94%
1M
1.77%
YTD
3.51%
6M
4.94%
1Y
21.38%
3Y*
16.39%
5Y*
7.79%
10Y*
10.92%

EEIAX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.61%
YTD
4.30%
6M
5.00%
1Y
16.81%
3Y*
9.55%
5Y*
4.10%
10Y*
4.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EXG vs. EEIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EXG
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Diversified Equity Income Fund
3.51%27.79%16.04%11.46%-22.24%31.53%10.19%28.71%-12.09%29.58%
EEIAX
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund
4.30%23.43%-1.23%13.63%-11.99%-7.64%4.68%22.66%-8.38%16.10%

Correlation

The correlation between EXG and EEIAX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2007

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EXG vs. EEIAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EXG
EXG Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
EXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXG Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
EXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXG Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

EEIAX
EEIAX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
EEIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
EEIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EXG vs. EEIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Diversified Equity Income Fund (EXG) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund (EEIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EXGEEIAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.45

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.50

2.28

-0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.86

8.18

-1.33

EXG vs. EEIAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EXG Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is lower than the EEIAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXG and EEIAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EXG vs. EEIAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXG drawdown since its inception was -58.45%, which is greater than EEIAX's maximum drawdown of -31.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXG and EEIAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EXGEEIAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.45%

-31.70%

-26.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.28%

-7.40%

-6.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.12%

-9.34%

-5.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.82%

-25.94%

-1.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.36%

-28.43%

-16.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.56%

-1.58%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.59%

-8.90%

-0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

2.06%

+1.06%

Volatility

EXG vs. EEIAX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Diversified Equity Income Fund (EXG) has a higher volatility of 4.29% compared to Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund (EEIAX) at 2.05%. This indicates that EXG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EEIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EXGEEIAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.29%

2.05%

+2.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.47%

6.44%

+5.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.03%

7.47%

+6.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.54%

8.21%

+9.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.99%

8.41%

+11.58%

EXG vs. EEIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EXG has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than EEIAX's 1.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

EXG vs. EEIAX - Dividend Comparison

EXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.33%, less than EEIAX's 9.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEIAX
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund
9.94%8.48%11.19%11.34%13.39%11.14%9.77%13.03%10.48%8.74%10.80%11.65%
EXG
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Diversified Equity Income Fund
8.33%8.27%9.27%8.60%10.59%7.27%8.43%8.42%12.23%9.84%12.16%11.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


EXG and EEIAX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EXG has higher volatility (4.29%) compared to EEIAX (2.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EXG dropped -58.45% vs EEIAX's -31.70%.

EEIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EXG and EEIAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer