EXEYX vs. FCGSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier Equity Series (EXEYX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX).
EXEYX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on May 1, 1998. FCGSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 7, 2013.
Performance
EXEYX vs. FCGSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EXEYX vs. FCGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXEYX Manning & Napier Equity Series | -10.84% | 8.77% | 15.87% | 24.52% | -19.51% | 25.41% | 23.74% | 33.64% | -3.94% | 28.89% |
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund | -2.49% | 25.52% | 38.00% | 45.97% | -32.15% | 25.13% | 70.01% | 39.75% | -4.03% | 37.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EXEYX achieves a -10.84% return, which is significantly lower than FCGSX's -2.49% return. Over the past 10 years, EXEYX has underperformed FCGSX with an annualized return of 11.69%, while FCGSX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.96% annualized return.
EXEYX
- 1D
- 2.99%
- 1M
- -6.80%
- YTD
- -10.84%
- 6M
- -7.56%
- 1Y
- 3.03%
- 3Y*
- 9.29%
- 5Y*
- 5.43%
- 10Y*
- 11.69%
FCGSX
- 1D
- 4.44%
- 1M
- -4.59%
- YTD
- -2.49%
- 6M
- 1.86%
- 1Y
- 38.78%
- 3Y*
- 28.90%
- 5Y*
- 14.89%
- 10Y*
- 21.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EXEYX vs. FCGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EXEYX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FCGSX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EXEYX vs. FCGSX — Risk / Return Rank
EXEYX
FCGSX
EXEYX vs. FCGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Equity Series (EXEYX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EXEYX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.18 | 1.66 | -1.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.40 | 2.34 | -1.94 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.33 | -0.28 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.24 | 2.98 | -2.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.85 | 13.43 | -12.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EXEYX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 | 1.66 | -1.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.63 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.95 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.88 | -0.41 |
Correlation
The correlation between EXEYX and FCGSX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EXEYX vs. FCGSX - Dividend Comparison
EXEYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.63%, more than FCGSX's 10.74% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXEYX Manning & Napier Equity Series | 12.63% | 11.26% | 11.88% | 3.11% | 13.28% | 16.60% | 8.31% | 10.39% | 20.49% | 7.57% | 4.98% | 44.53% |
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund | 10.74% | 10.48% | 12.49% | 3.13% | 0.61% | 38.65% | 31.99% | 11.06% | 13.21% | 10.51% | 2.44% | 0.25% |
Drawdowns
EXEYX vs. FCGSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EXEYX drawdown since its inception was -54.49%, which is greater than FCGSX's maximum drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXEYX and FCGSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EXEYX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.49% | -38.77% | -15.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.40% | -13.10% | -3.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.62% | -38.77% | +13.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.30% | -38.77% | +6.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.62% | -6.44% | -7.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.88% | -7.05% | -0.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.53% | 2.91% | +1.62% |
Volatility
EXEYX vs. FCGSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Manning & Napier Equity Series (EXEYX) is 5.63%, while Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX) has a volatility of 8.15%. This indicates that EXEYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EXEYX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.63% | 8.15% | -2.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.84% | 14.39% | -3.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.08% | 24.14% | -5.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.86% | 23.69% | -6.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.91% | 23.19% | -5.28% |