PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EXEL vs. GLDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EXEL vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Exelixis, Inc. (EXEL) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EXEL achieves a 20.99% return, which is significantly higher than GLDM's -6.13% return.


EXEL

1D
-5.25%
1M
-1.72%
6M
28.22%
YTD
20.99%
1Y
46.41%
3Y*
39.27%
5Y*
25.77%
10Y*
19.21%
ALL TIME*
4.71%

GLDM

1D
-1.46%
1M
0.28%
6M
-16.53%
YTD
-6.13%
1Y
23.01%
3Y*
27.59%
5Y*
17.31%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$119.34M$130.32M$139.06M
$263.44M$251.25M$317.77M

EXEL vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EXEL
Exelixis, Inc.
20.99%31.62%38.81%49.56%-12.25%-8.92%13.90%-10.42%0.67%
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
-6.13%64.20%27.08%13.04%-0.47%-4.01%25.10%18.10%1.75%

Correlation

The correlation between EXEL and GLDM is 0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2018

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EXEL vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EXEL
EXEL Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
EXEL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXEL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXEL Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
EXEL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXEL Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDM
GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EXEL vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Exelixis, Inc. (EXEL) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EXELGLDMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.17

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

0.88

+1.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.84

1.90

+6.94

EXEL vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EXEL Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is higher than the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXEL and GLDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EXEL vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXEL drawdown since its inception was -97.38%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -26.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXEL and GLDM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EXELGLDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.38%

-26.27%

-71.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.47%

-26.27%

+9.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.34%

-26.27%

+0.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.41%

-26.27%

-9.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.13%

-24.94%

+17.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-70.68%

-6.56%

-64.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.27%

12.12%

-6.85%

Volatility

EXEL vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

Exelixis, Inc. (EXEL) has a higher volatility of 8.73% compared to SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) at 6.35%. This indicates that EXEL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EXELGLDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.73%

6.35%

+2.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.34%

23.37%

+0.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.10%

27.92%

+7.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.68%

18.39%

+17.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.47%

17.10%

+27.37%

Dividends

EXEL vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

Neither EXEL nor GLDM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


EXEL and GLDM have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EXEL has higher volatility (8.73%) compared to GLDM (6.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EXEL dropped -97.38% vs GLDM's -26.27%.

EXEL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EXEL and GLDM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer