EXCRX vs. MNHYX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier Core Bond Series (EXCRX) and Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series (MNHYX).
EXCRX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Apr 21, 2005. MNHYX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Sep 14, 2009.
Performance
EXCRX vs. MNHYX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EXCRX vs. MNHYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXCRX Manning & Napier Core Bond Series | -0.06% | 6.82% | 1.05% | 5.47% | -13.20% | -1.89% | 8.66% | 8.18% | -0.74% | 2.91% |
MNHYX Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series | -0.59% | 6.65% | 9.63% | 13.19% | -7.59% | 9.99% | 6.26% | 13.99% | -1.30% | 8.49% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EXCRX achieves a -0.06% return, which is significantly higher than MNHYX's -0.59% return. Over the past 10 years, EXCRX has underperformed MNHYX with an annualized return of 1.58%, while MNHYX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.65% annualized return.
EXCRX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -1.55%
- YTD
- -0.06%
- 6M
- 0.53%
- 1Y
- 3.31%
- 3Y*
- 3.35%
- 5Y*
- -0.01%
- 10Y*
- 1.58%
MNHYX
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -1.15%
- YTD
- -0.59%
- 6M
- 0.52%
- 1Y
- 5.04%
- 3Y*
- 8.76%
- 5Y*
- 5.40%
- 10Y*
- 6.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EXCRX vs. MNHYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EXCRX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than MNHYX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EXCRX vs. MNHYX — Risk / Return Rank
EXCRX
MNHYX
EXCRX vs. MNHYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Core Bond Series (EXCRX) and Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series (MNHYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EXCRX | MNHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.85 | 1.43 | -0.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.22 | 1.91 | -0.68 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.33 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 1.49 | -0.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.59 | 5.83 | -2.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EXCRX | MNHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 1.43 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 | 1.48 | -1.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | 1.61 | -1.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 1.80 | -1.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between EXCRX and MNHYX is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EXCRX vs. MNHYX - Dividend Comparison
EXCRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, less than MNHYX's 6.89% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXCRX Manning & Napier Core Bond Series | 4.26% | 4.18% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 2.23% | 2.28% | 5.15% | 2.01% | 2.32% | 1.94% | 2.14% | 2.45% |
MNHYX Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series | 6.89% | 6.95% | 6.38% | 6.66% | 5.93% | 7.93% | 4.98% | 6.63% | 5.26% | 5.16% | 6.49% | 5.60% |
Drawdowns
EXCRX vs. MNHYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EXCRX drawdown since its inception was -18.70%, smaller than the maximum MNHYX drawdown of -19.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXCRX and MNHYX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EXCRX | MNHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.70% | -19.70% | +1.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.09% | -3.38% | +0.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.65% | -10.84% | -7.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.70% | -19.70% | +1.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.11% | -1.69% | -1.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.87% | -1.57% | -1.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.11% | 0.86% | +0.25% |
Volatility
EXCRX vs. MNHYX - Volatility Comparison
Manning & Napier Core Bond Series (EXCRX) has a higher volatility of 1.79% compared to Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series (MNHYX) at 1.62%. This indicates that EXCRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNHYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EXCRX | MNHYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.79% | 1.62% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.73% | 2.12% | +0.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.60% | 3.68% | +0.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.87% | 3.67% | +2.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.83% | 4.15% | +0.68% |