PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EXAS vs. GH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EXAS vs. GH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Exact Sciences Corporation (EXAS) and Guardant Health, Inc. (GH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


EXAS

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GH

1D
-2.41%
1M
39.33%
YTD
24.37%
6M
19.88%
1Y
177.42%
3Y*
57.70%
5Y*
1.54%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EXAS vs. GH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EXAS
Exact Sciences Corporation
3.30%80.74%-24.05%49.42%-36.39%-41.26%43.26%46.56%-12.91%
GH
Guardant Health, Inc.
24.37%234.34%12.94%-0.55%-72.81%-22.39%64.93%107.87%16.74%

Correlation

The correlation between EXAS and GH is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2018

0.47

Over the past year, the correlation between EXAS and GH has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EXAS:

$19.91B

GH:

$16.68B

EPS

EXAS:

-$1.10

GH:

-$3.40

PS Ratio

EXAS:

6.12

GH:

14.97

Total Revenue (TTM)

EXAS:

$3.25B

GH:

$1.08B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EXAS:

$2.26B

GH:

$701.01M

EBITDA (TTM)

EXAS:

$42.61M

GH:

-$411.42M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EXAS vs. GH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EXAS

GH
GH Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
GH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
GH Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
GH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
GH Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EXAS vs. GH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Exact Sciences Corporation (EXAS) and Guardant Health, Inc. (GH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EXAS vs. GH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EXASGHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

Drawdowns

EXAS vs. GH - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EXASGHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-59.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-87.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.26%

Volatility

EXAS vs. GH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EXASGHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

68.13%

Dividends

EXAS vs. GH - Dividend Comparison

Neither EXAS nor GH has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

EXAS vs. GH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Exact Sciences Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
878.38M
301.67M
(EXAS) Total Revenue
(GH) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

EXAS vs. GH - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Exact Sciences Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

60.0%65.0%70.0%75.0%20222023202420252026
70.1%
65.2%
Portfolio components
EXAS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exact Sciences Corporation reported a gross profit of 615.83M and revenue of 878.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.1%.

GH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Guardant Health, Inc. reported a gross profit of 196.75M and revenue of 301.67M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.2%.

EXAS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exact Sciences Corporation reported an operating income of -76.68M and revenue of 878.38M, resulting in an operating margin of -8.7%.

GH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Guardant Health, Inc. reported an operating income of -121.35M and revenue of 301.67M, resulting in an operating margin of -40.2%.

EXAS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exact Sciences Corporation reported a net income of -85.96M and revenue of 878.38M, resulting in a net margin of -9.8%.

GH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Guardant Health, Inc. reported a net income of -112.08M and revenue of 301.67M, resulting in a net margin of -37.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


EXAS and GH have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EXAS and GH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer