PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EXAS vs. ACHC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EXAS vs. ACHC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Exact Sciences Corporation (EXAS) and Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. (ACHC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


EXAS

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ACHC

1D
5.36%
1M
-7.06%
YTD
81.32%
6M
75.15%
1Y
14.66%
3Y*
-28.19%
5Y*
-17.07%
10Y*
-8.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EXAS vs. ACHC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EXAS
Exact Sciences Corporation
3.30%80.74%-24.05%49.42%-36.39%-41.26%43.26%46.56%20.10%293.26%
ACHC
Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc.
81.32%-64.21%-49.01%-5.54%35.62%20.77%51.29%29.21%-21.21%-1.42%

Correlation

The correlation between EXAS and ACHC is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2001

0.15

The correlation between EXAS and ACHC shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (1 year) to 0.27 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EXAS:

$19.91B

ACHC:

$2.34B

EPS

EXAS:

-$1.10

ACHC:

-$12.22

PS Ratio

EXAS:

6.12

ACHC:

0.69

PB Ratio

EXAS:

8.29

ACHC:

1.19

Total Revenue (TTM)

EXAS:

$3.25B

ACHC:

$3.37B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EXAS:

$2.26B

ACHC:

$1.76B

EBITDA (TTM)

EXAS:

$42.61M

ACHC:

-$726.15M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EXAS vs. ACHC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EXAS

ACHC
ACHC Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
ACHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACHC Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ACHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACHC Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EXAS vs. ACHC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Exact Sciences Corporation (EXAS) and Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. (ACHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EXAS vs. ACHC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EXASACHCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.00

Drawdowns

EXAS vs. ACHC - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EXASACHCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-57.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-86.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-86.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-71.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.44%

Volatility

EXAS vs. ACHC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EXASACHCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

49.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.63%

Dividends

EXAS vs. ACHC - Dividend Comparison

Neither EXAS nor ACHC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

EXAS vs. ACHC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Exact Sciences Corporation and Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00M800.00M900.00M20222023202420252026
878.38M
828.80M
(EXAS) Total Revenue
(ACHC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

EXAS vs. ACHC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Exact Sciences Corporation and Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
70.1%
0
Portfolio components
EXAS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exact Sciences Corporation reported a gross profit of 615.83M and revenue of 878.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.1%.

ACHC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 828.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

EXAS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exact Sciences Corporation reported an operating income of -76.68M and revenue of 878.38M, resulting in an operating margin of -8.7%.

ACHC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 828.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

EXAS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Exact Sciences Corporation reported a net income of -85.96M and revenue of 878.38M, resulting in a net margin of -9.8%.

ACHC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. reported a net income of 4.11M and revenue of 828.80M, resulting in a net margin of 0.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


EXAS and ACHC have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EXAS and ACHC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer