EXAS vs. ACHC
Compare and contrast key facts about Exact Sciences Corporation (EXAS) and Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. (ACHC).
Performance
EXAS vs. ACHC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EXAS vs. ACHC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXAS Exact Sciences Corporation | 3.30% | 80.74% | -24.05% | 49.42% | -36.39% | -41.26% | 43.26% | 46.56% | 20.10% | 293.26% |
ACHC Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. | 64.83% | -64.21% | -49.01% | -5.54% | 35.62% | 20.77% | 51.29% | 29.21% | -21.21% | -1.42% |
Fundamentals
EXAS:
$19.91B
ACHC:
$2.12B
EXAS:
-$1.10
ACHC:
-$12.19
EXAS:
6.12
ACHC:
0.64
EXAS:
8.29
ACHC:
1.09
EXAS:
$3.25B
ACHC:
$3.31B
EXAS:
$2.26B
ACHC:
$1.91B
EXAS:
$42.61M
ACHC:
-$737.83M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EXAS achieves a 3.30% return, which is significantly lower than ACHC's 64.83% return. Over the past 10 years, EXAS has outperformed ACHC with an annualized return of 32.78%, while ACHC has yielded a comparatively lower -8.19% annualized return.
EXAS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.48%
- YTD
- 3.30%
- 6M
- 91.76%
- 1Y
- 142.34%
- 3Y*
- 16.54%
- 5Y*
- -3.61%
- 10Y*
- 32.78%
ACHC
- 1D
- 2.45%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- YTD
- 64.83%
- 6M
- -5.53%
- 1Y
- -22.86%
- 3Y*
- -31.34%
- 5Y*
- -16.26%
- 10Y*
- -8.19%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EXAS vs. ACHC — Risk / Return Rank
EXAS
ACHC
EXAS vs. ACHC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Exact Sciences Corporation (EXAS) and Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. (ACHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EXAS | ACHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.80 | -0.34 | +3.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.37 | -0.10 | +4.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | 0.99 | +0.65 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.40 | -0.36 | +4.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.32 | -0.65 | +15.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EXAS | ACHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.80 | -0.34 | +3.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 | -0.36 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | -0.17 | +0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | -0.00 | +0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between EXAS and ACHC is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EXAS vs. ACHC - Dividend Comparison
Neither EXAS nor ACHC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
EXAS vs. ACHC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EXAS drawdown since its inception was -98.01%, roughly equal to the maximum ACHC drawdown of -98.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXAS and ACHC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EXAS | ACHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.01% | -98.77% | +0.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.56% | -60.98% | +31.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.21% | -86.89% | +8.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.42% | -86.89% | +6.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.32% | -73.74% | +41.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.80% | -56.38% | +6.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.48% | 34.35% | -25.87% |
Volatility
EXAS vs. ACHC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Exact Sciences Corporation (EXAS) is 1.18%, while Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. (ACHC) has a volatility of 14.87%. This indicates that EXAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACHC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EXAS | ACHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.18% | 14.87% | -13.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.31% | 50.07% | -21.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.22% | 66.53% | -22.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.53% | 44.98% | +9.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.98% | 48.28% | +11.70% |
Financials
EXAS vs. ACHC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Exact Sciences Corporation and Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities