PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWZS vs. COLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWZS vs. COLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Brazil Small-Cap ETF (EWZS) and Global X MSCI Colombia ETF (COLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWZS achieves a 4.95% return, which is significantly lower than COLO's 16.98% return. Over the past 10 years, EWZS has outperformed COLO with an annualized return of 7.86%, while COLO has yielded a comparatively lower 6.63% annualized return.


EWZS

1D
-4.37%
1M
-8.19%
YTD
4.95%
6M
-2.70%
1Y
8.41%
3Y*
2.41%
5Y*
-4.16%
10Y*
7.86%

COLO

1D
-0.12%
1M
9.05%
YTD
16.98%
6M
17.41%
1Y
55.59%
3Y*
35.57%
5Y*
15.34%
10Y*
6.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWZS vs. COLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWZS
iShares MSCI Brazil Small-Cap ETF
4.95%45.18%-35.95%32.65%-11.20%-14.09%-20.86%50.60%-7.13%54.18%
COLO
Global X MSCI Colombia ETF
16.98%68.88%4.68%24.92%-21.32%-11.50%-14.60%30.42%-19.88%11.88%

Correlation

The correlation between EWZS and COLO is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2010

0.47

EWZS vs. COLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWZS
COLO

Basic Materials

16.5%
18.4%

Consumer Cyclical

15.5%
1.5%

Real Estate

13.4%

-

Utilities

12.1%
17.7%

Consumer Defensive

10.9%

-

Financial Services

10.4%
39.3%

Industrials

8.6%
2.4%

Energy

4.8%
17.3%

Healthcare

4.8%

-

Technology

3.0%

-

Communication Services

-

3.4%

Basic Materials

EWZS
16.5%
COLO
18.4%

Consumer Cyclical

EWZS
15.5%
COLO
1.5%

Real Estate

EWZS
13.4%
COLO

-

Utilities

EWZS
12.1%
COLO
17.7%

Consumer Defensive

EWZS
10.9%
COLO

-

Financial Services

EWZS
10.4%
COLO
39.3%

Industrials

EWZS
8.6%
COLO
2.4%

Energy

EWZS
4.8%
COLO
17.3%

Healthcare

EWZS
4.8%
COLO

-

Technology

EWZS
3.0%
COLO

-

Communication Services

EWZS

-

COLO
3.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWZS vs. COLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWZS
EWZS Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
EWZS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWZS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWZS Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
EWZS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWZS Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

COLO
COLO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
COLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
COLO Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
COLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
COLO Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWZS vs. COLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Brazil Small-Cap ETF (EWZS) and Global X MSCI Colombia ETF (COLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWZSCOLODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.28

2.52

-2.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.60

3.40

-2.80

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.44

-0.36

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.50

3.13

-2.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.24

8.60

-7.36

EWZS vs. COLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWZS Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is lower than the COLO Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWZS and COLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWZSCOLODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

2.52

-2.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

0.67

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

0.26

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.03

0.22

-0.26

Drawdowns

EWZS vs. COLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWZS drawdown since its inception was -79.23%, roughly equal to the maximum COLO drawdown of -78.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWZS and COLO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWZSCOLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.23%

-78.91%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.05%

-17.79%

+0.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.55%

-18.35%

-19.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.78%

-43.86%

-4.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.15%

-62.75%

-0.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.99%

-20.59%

-10.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.57%

-40.32%

+3.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.79%

6.47%

+0.32%

Volatility

EWZS vs. COLO - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Brazil Small-Cap ETF (EWZS) and Global X MSCI Colombia ETF (COLO) have volatilities of 11.03% and 10.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWZSCOLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.03%

10.60%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.56%

19.27%

+6.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.44%

22.13%

+8.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.12%

23.18%

+9.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.79%

25.43%

+11.36%

EWZS vs. COLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWZS has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than COLO's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWZS vs. COLO - Dividend Comparison

EWZS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, less than COLO's 6.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COLO
Global X MSCI Colombia ETF
6.42%7.51%6.08%6.99%12.55%2.32%3.23%3.04%3.03%1.83%1.48%1.58%
EWZS
iShares MSCI Brazil Small-Cap ETF
3.69%3.88%4.93%2.75%4.61%4.51%1.15%1.77%4.35%3.41%3.62%4.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWZS and COLO have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWZS has higher volatility (11.03%) compared to COLO (10.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWZS dropped -79.23% vs COLO's -78.91%.

On 10-year performance, EWZS leads with 7.86% vs 6.63% for COLO. On fees, EWZS is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, COLO has been the lower-risk option at 10.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWZS has performed better with a 7.86% return vs 6.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWZS is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for COLO.

COLO has the higher dividend yield at 6.42%, compared with 3.69% for EWZS.

EWZS tracks MSCI Brazil Small Cap Index, while COLO tracks MSCI All Colombia Select 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EWZS and 0.62% for COLO.

COLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWZS and COLO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer