PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWZ vs. XOP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWZ vs. XOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (EWZ) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWZ achieves a 14.17% return, which is significantly lower than XOP's 26.71% return. Over the past 10 years, EWZ has outperformed XOP with an annualized return of 6.86%, while XOP has yielded a comparatively lower 2.97% annualized return.


EWZ

1D
2.77%
1M
4.20%
6M
9.71%
YTD
14.17%
1Y
36.37%
3Y*
10.52%
5Y*
6.56%
10Y*
6.86%

XOP

1D
-0.56%
1M
-2.49%
6M
25.57%
YTD
26.71%
1Y
21.93%
3Y*
8.56%
5Y*
13.75%
10Y*
2.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWZ vs. XOP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWZ
iShares MSCI Brazil ETF
14.17%48.81%-30.41%32.62%12.09%-17.32%-20.35%27.67%-2.52%23.62%
XOP
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
26.71%-2.15%-1.00%3.56%45.37%66.74%-36.40%-9.44%-28.10%-9.47%

Correlation

The correlation between EWZ and XOP is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006

0.49

The correlation between EWZ and XOP shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EWZ vs. XOP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWZ
XOP

Financial Services

33.4%

-

Energy

16.7%
96.8%

Basic Materials

15.3%
3.2%

Utilities

12.8%

-

Industrials

11.0%
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%

-

Healthcare

2.3%

-

Communication Services

2.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.4%

-

Technology

0.4%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Financial Services

EWZ
33.4%
XOP

-

Energy

EWZ
16.7%
XOP
96.8%

Basic Materials

EWZ
15.3%
XOP
3.2%

Utilities

EWZ
12.8%
XOP

-

Industrials

EWZ
11.0%
XOP
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

EWZ
4.6%
XOP

-

Healthcare

EWZ
2.3%
XOP

-

Communication Services

EWZ
2.1%
XOP

-

Consumer Cyclical

EWZ
1.4%
XOP

-

Technology

EWZ
0.4%
XOP

-

Real Estate

EWZ

-

XOP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWZ vs. XOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWZ
EWZ Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
EWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
EWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

XOP
XOP Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
XOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOP Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
XOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOP Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWZ vs. XOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (EWZ) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EWZXOPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.15

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

1.23

+0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.94

3.01

+1.92

EWZ vs. XOP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is higher than the XOP Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWZ and XOP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EWZ vs. XOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWZ drawdown since its inception was -77.25%, smaller than the maximum XOP drawdown of -90.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWZ and XOP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWZXOPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.25%

-90.27%

+13.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.27%

-18.50%

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.36%

-34.98%

+3.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.24%

-34.98%

+2.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.99%

-82.61%

+25.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.49%

-40.77%

+20.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.90%

-42.57%

+6.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.20%

7.54%

-0.34%

Volatility

EWZ vs. XOP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (EWZ) is 5.74%, while SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) has a volatility of 7.88%. This indicates that EWZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWZXOPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.74%

7.88%

-2.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.70%

22.07%

-2.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.98%

28.03%

-3.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.60%

33.73%

-6.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.90%

40.17%

-6.27%

EWZ vs. XOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWZ has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than XOP's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWZ vs. XOP - Dividend Comparison

EWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, more than XOP's 2.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWZ
iShares MSCI Brazil ETF
4.07%5.19%8.91%5.66%12.59%9.87%1.71%2.54%2.89%1.71%1.81%4.08%
XOP
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
2.05%2.62%2.45%2.63%2.47%1.61%2.34%1.47%0.99%0.76%0.76%2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWZ and XOP have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XOP has higher volatility (7.88%) compared to EWZ (5.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWZ dropped -77.25% vs XOP's -90.27%.

On 10-year performance, EWZ leads with 6.86% vs 2.97% for XOP. On fees, XOP is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, EWZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWZ has performed better with a 6.86% return vs 2.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XOP is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWZ.

EWZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.07%, compared with 2.05% for XOP.

EWZ is categorized as Latin America Equities, while XOP is Energy Equities. EWZ tracks MSCI Brazil 25/50 Index, while XOP tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EWZ and 0.35% for XOP.

EWZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWZ and XOP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer