EWZ vs. FLN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EWZ (iShares MSCI Brazil ETF) and FLN (First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund) are both Latin America Equities funds - EWZ tracks the MSCI Brazil 25/50 Index while FLN tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Latin America Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWZ returned 7.81%/yr vs 9.85%/yr for FLN. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EWZ charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FLN.

Performance

EWZ vs. FLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (EWZ) and First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund (FLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWZ achieves a 9.03% return, which is significantly lower than FLN's 11.67% return. Over the past 10 years, EWZ has underperformed FLN with an annualized return of 7.81%, while FLN has yielded a comparatively higher 9.85% annualized return.

EWZ

• 1D: -3.19%
• 1M: -11.27%
• YTD: 9.03%
• 6M: 4.84%
• 1Y: 32.42%
• 3Y*: 11.04%
• 5Y*: 4.31%
• 10Y*: 7.81%

FLN

• 1D: -2.00%
• 1M: -5.45%
• YTD: 11.67%
• 6M: 11.54%
• 1Y: 36.27%
• 3Y*: 16.20%
• 5Y*: 8.98%
• 10Y*: 9.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWZ vs. FLN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EWZ iShares MSCI Brazil ETF	9.03%	48.81%	-30.41%	32.62%	12.09%	-17.32%	-20.35%	27.67%	-2.52%	23.62%
FLN First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund	11.67%	55.05%	-23.10%	29.68%	2.73%	-6.94%	-12.27%	27.22%	-8.31%	21.54%

Correlation

The correlation between EWZ and FLN is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2011	0.76

The correlation between EWZ and FLN shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (all time) to 0.89 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EWZ vs. FLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EWZ	FLN
Financial Services	32.7%	23.4%
Energy	18.5%	10.2%
Basic Materials	13.7%	12.0%
Utilities	12.9%	16.9%
Industrials	10.9%	12.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.2%	7.2%
Healthcare	2.4%	0.6%
Communication Services	2.2%	7.1%
Consumer Cyclical	1.5%	5.4%
Technology	1.0%	2.1%
Real Estate	-	4.7%

Return for Risk

EWZ vs. FLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWZ

EWZ Risk / Return Rank: 36
EWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
EWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
EWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 34
EWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
EWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 38

FLN

FLN Risk / Return Rank: 52
FLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
FLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
FLN Omega Ratio Rank: 47
FLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
FLN Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWZ vs. FLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (EWZ) and First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund (FLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EWZ	FLN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.31	1.74	-0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.81	2.31	-0.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.30	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.92	3.19	-1.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.10	9.06	-2.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EWZ vs. FLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the FLN Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWZ and FLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EWZ	FLN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.31	1.74	-0.43
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16	0.40	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23	0.36	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.17	0.08	+0.08

Drawdowns

EWZ vs. FLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWZ drawdown since its inception was -77.25%, which is greater than FLN's maximum drawdown of -57.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWZ and FLN.

Drawdown Indicators

	EWZ	FLN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.25%	-57.95%	-19.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.99%	-11.42%	-5.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.36%	-25.23%	-6.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.24%	-25.95%	-6.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-56.99%	-57.75%	+0.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.07%	-9.99%	-14.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.95%	-18.90%	-17.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.33%	4.01%	+1.32%

Volatility

EWZ vs. FLN - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (EWZ) has a higher volatility of 7.84% compared to First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund (FLN) at 6.41%. This indicates that EWZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EWZ	FLN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.84%	6.41%	+1.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.78%	18.20%	+2.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.97%	20.96%	+4.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.68%	22.59%	+5.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.10%	27.64%	+6.46%

EWZ vs. FLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWZ has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than FLN's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

EWZ vs. FLN - Dividend Comparison

EWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.76%, more than FLN's 3.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EWZ iShares MSCI Brazil ETF	4.76%	5.19%	8.91%	5.66%	12.59%	9.87%	1.71%	2.54%	2.89%	1.71%	1.81%	4.08%
FLN First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund	3.59%	3.40%	6.26%	4.17%	5.57%	4.70%	1.64%	1.91%	3.08%	10.28%	1.06%	2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EWZ and FLN in my portfolio?

EWZ and FLN have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EWZ or FLN?

EWZ has higher volatility (7.84%) compared to FLN (6.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWZ dropped -77.25% vs FLN's -57.95%.

Which ETF is better, EWZ or FLN?

On 10-year performance, FLN leads with 9.85% vs 7.81% for EWZ. On fees, EWZ is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, FLN has been the lower-risk option at 6.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EWZ or FLN?

Over the 10-year period, FLN has performed better with a 9.85% return vs 7.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EWZ or FLN?

EWZ is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FLN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EWZ or FLN?

EWZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.76%, compared with 3.59% for FLN.

What is the main difference between EWZ and FLN?

EWZ tracks MSCI Brazil 25/50 Index, while FLN tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Latin America Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EWZ and 0.80% for FLN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.