EWZ vs. EZA
EWZ (iShares MSCI Brazil ETF) and EZA (iShares MSCI South Africa ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWZ is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the MSCI Brazil 25/50 Index, while EZA is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI South Africa Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWZ returned 8.29%/yr vs 8.12%/yr for EZA. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.59% expense ratio.
Performance
EWZ vs. EZA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWZ achieves a 10.48% return, which is significantly higher than EZA's -2.81% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EWZ having a 8.29% annualized return and EZA not far behind at 8.12%.
EWZ
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -5.47%
- YTD
- 10.48%
- 6M
- 9.03%
- 1Y
- 31.51%
- 3Y*
- 9.47%
- 5Y*
- 4.96%
- 10Y*
- 8.29%
EZA
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- -5.12%
- YTD
- -2.81%
- 6M
- 2.77%
- 1Y
- 33.90%
- 3Y*
- 23.45%
- 5Y*
- 9.50%
- 10Y*
- 8.12%
EWZ vs. EZA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWZ iShares MSCI Brazil ETF | 10.48% | 48.81% | -30.41% | 32.62% | 12.09% | -17.32% | -20.35% | 27.67% | -2.52% | 23.62% |
EZA iShares MSCI South Africa ETF | -2.81% | 75.20% | 7.16% | 1.51% | -5.18% | 7.91% | -5.19% | 9.83% | -25.24% | 36.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWZ and EZA is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2003 | 0.62 |
The correlation between EWZ and EZA shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (5 years) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EWZ vs. EZA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWZ
EZA
Financial Services
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
EWZ
EZA
Energy
EWZ
EZA
-
Basic Materials
EWZ
EZA
Utilities
EWZ
EZA
-
Industrials
EWZ
EZA
Consumer Defensive
EWZ
EZA
Healthcare
EWZ
EZA
Communication Services
EWZ
EZA
Consumer Cyclical
EWZ
EZA
Technology
EWZ
EZA
-
Real Estate
EWZ
-
EZA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWZ vs. EZA — Risk / Return Rank
EWZ
EZA
EWZ vs. EZA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (EWZ) and iShares MSCI South Africa ETF (EZA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EWZ | EZA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.18 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 1.31 | +0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.17 | 3.41 | +1.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EWZ vs. EZA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWZ drawdown since its inception was -77.25%, which is greater than EZA's maximum drawdown of -64.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWZ and EZA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWZ | EZA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.25% | -64.64% | -12.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.27% | -23.31% | +4.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.36% | -23.31% | -8.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.24% | -34.94% | +2.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.99% | -62.25% | +5.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.06% | -18.05% | -5.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.93% | -16.92% | -19.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.10% | 8.93% | -2.83% |
Volatility
EWZ vs. EZA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (EWZ) is 7.35%, while iShares MSCI South Africa ETF (EZA) has a volatility of 11.34%. This indicates that EWZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EZA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWZ | EZA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.35% | 11.34% | -3.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.97% | 27.03% | -7.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.20% | 31.92% | -6.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.70% | 28.86% | -1.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.04% | 31.43% | +2.61% |
EWZ vs. EZA - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EWZ and EZA have an expense ratio of 0.59%.
Dividends
EWZ vs. EZA - Dividend Comparison
EWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, less than EZA's 6.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWZ iShares MSCI Brazil ETF | 4.70% | 5.19% | 8.91% | 5.66% | 12.59% | 9.87% | 1.71% | 2.54% | 2.89% | 1.71% | 1.81% | 4.08% |
EZA iShares MSCI South Africa ETF | 6.34% | 6.16% | 7.26% | 2.84% | 3.90% | 2.05% | 5.51% | 12.27% | 3.81% | 1.55% | 4.10% | 3.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWZ and EZA have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EZA has higher volatility (11.34%) compared to EWZ (7.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWZ dropped -77.25% vs EZA's -64.64%.
On 10-year performance, EWZ leads with 8.29% vs 8.12% for EZA. Both ETFs have the same 0.59% expense ratio. On volatility, EWZ has been the lower-risk option at 7.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWZ has performed better with a 8.29% return vs 8.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWZ and EZA have the same expense ratio: 0.59% per year.
EZA has the higher dividend yield at 6.34%, compared with 4.70% for EWZ.
EWZ is categorized as Latin America Equities, while EZA is Emerging Markets Equities. EWZ tracks MSCI Brazil 25/50 Index, while EZA tracks MSCI South Africa Index.
EWZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWZ and EZA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer