PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWY vs. XLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWY vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWY achieves a 103.10% return, which is significantly higher than XLE's 29.56% return. Over the past 10 years, EWY has outperformed XLE with an annualized return of 16.84%, while XLE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.91% annualized return.


EWY

1D
-0.75%
1M
4.68%
YTD
103.10%
6M
117.85%
1Y
198.25%
3Y*
46.46%
5Y*
18.80%
10Y*
16.84%

XLE

1D
0.75%
1M
-0.14%
YTD
29.56%
6M
28.37%
1Y
37.19%
3Y*
16.18%
5Y*
20.12%
10Y*
9.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWY vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWY
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF
103.10%95.33%-20.48%19.05%-26.59%-7.58%39.43%7.97%-20.37%44.97%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
29.56%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-18.22%-0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between EWY and XLE is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2000

0.41

Over the past year, the correlation between EWY and XLE has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

EWY vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWY
XLE

Technology

52.4%

-

Industrials

20.4%

-

Financial Services

9.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%

-

Healthcare

3.5%

-

Communication Services

2.9%

-

Basic Materials

2.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.7%

-

Energy

1.4%
100.0%

Utilities

0.4%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

EWY
52.4%
XLE

-

Industrials

EWY
20.4%
XLE

-

Financial Services

EWY
9.6%
XLE

-

Consumer Cyclical

EWY
5.7%
XLE

-

Healthcare

EWY
3.5%
XLE

-

Communication Services

EWY
2.9%
XLE

-

Basic Materials

EWY
2.0%
XLE

-

Consumer Defensive

EWY
1.7%
XLE

-

Energy

EWY
1.4%
XLE
100.0%

Utilities

EWY
0.4%
XLE

-

Real Estate

EWY

-

XLE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWY vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWY
EWY Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
EWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWY Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
EWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWY Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWY vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EWYXLEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.30

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.65

3.10

+5.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

30.24

8.63

+21.60

EWY vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWY Sharpe Ratio is 4.29, which is higher than the XLE Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWY and XLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EWY vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWY drawdown since its inception was -74.14%, roughly equal to the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWY and XLE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWYXLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.14%

-71.26%

-2.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.08%

-12.05%

-11.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.36%

-20.14%

-7.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.55%

-26.04%

-22.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.73%

-66.81%

+17.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.88%

-8.01%

-0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.11%

-17.97%

-2.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.59%

4.32%

+2.27%

Volatility

EWY vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) has a higher volatility of 25.64% compared to State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) at 7.26%. This indicates that EWY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWYXLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.64%

7.26%

+18.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.65%

16.79%

+25.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.51%

20.57%

+25.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.15%

26.05%

+4.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.06%

29.58%

-1.52%

EWY vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWY has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWY vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

EWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than XLE's 2.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWY
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF
1.03%2.10%2.55%2.52%1.23%2.16%0.73%2.10%1.34%2.90%1.21%2.42%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.59%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWY and XLE have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWY has higher volatility (25.64%) compared to XLE (7.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWY dropped -74.14% vs XLE's -71.26%.

On 10-year performance, EWY leads with 16.84% vs 9.91% for XLE. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLE has been the lower-risk option at 7.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWY has performed better with a 16.84% return vs 9.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWY.

XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 1.03% for EWY.

EWY is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while XLE is Energy Equities. EWY tracks MSCI Korea Index, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EWY and 0.08% for XLE.

EWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.29 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWY and XLE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer