EWY vs. XLE
EWY (iShares MSCI South Korea ETF) and XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWY is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Korea Index, while XLE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWY returned 16.84%/yr vs 9.91%/yr for XLE. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EWY charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLE.
Performance
EWY vs. XLE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWY achieves a 103.10% return, which is significantly higher than XLE's 29.56% return. Over the past 10 years, EWY has outperformed XLE with an annualized return of 16.84%, while XLE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.91% annualized return.
EWY
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 4.68%
- YTD
- 103.10%
- 6M
- 117.85%
- 1Y
- 198.25%
- 3Y*
- 46.46%
- 5Y*
- 18.80%
- 10Y*
- 16.84%
XLE
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- YTD
- 29.56%
- 6M
- 28.37%
- 1Y
- 37.19%
- 3Y*
- 16.18%
- 5Y*
- 20.12%
- 10Y*
- 9.91%
EWY vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 103.10% | 95.33% | -20.48% | 19.05% | -26.59% | -7.58% | 39.43% | 7.97% | -20.37% | 44.97% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 29.56% | 7.88% | 5.56% | -0.63% | 64.32% | 53.28% | -32.67% | 11.74% | -18.22% | -0.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWY and XLE is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2000 | 0.41 |
Over the past year, the correlation between EWY and XLE has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
EWY vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWY
XLE
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
EWY
XLE
-
Industrials
EWY
XLE
-
Financial Services
EWY
XLE
-
Consumer Cyclical
EWY
XLE
-
Healthcare
EWY
XLE
-
Communication Services
EWY
XLE
-
Basic Materials
EWY
XLE
-
Consumer Defensive
EWY
XLE
-
Energy
EWY
XLE
Utilities
EWY
XLE
-
Real Estate
EWY
-
XLE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWY vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank
EWY
XLE
EWY vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EWY | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.30 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.65 | 3.10 | +5.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.24 | 8.63 | +21.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EWY vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWY drawdown since its inception was -74.14%, roughly equal to the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWY and XLE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWY | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.14% | -71.26% | -2.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.08% | -12.05% | -11.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.36% | -20.14% | -7.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.55% | -26.04% | -22.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.73% | -66.81% | +17.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.88% | -8.01% | -0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.11% | -17.97% | -2.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.59% | 4.32% | +2.27% |
Volatility
EWY vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) has a higher volatility of 25.64% compared to State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) at 7.26%. This indicates that EWY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWY | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.64% | 7.26% | +18.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.65% | 16.79% | +25.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.51% | 20.57% | +25.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.15% | 26.05% | +4.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.06% | 29.58% | -1.52% |
EWY vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWY has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWY vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison
EWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than XLE's 2.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 1.03% | 2.10% | 2.55% | 2.52% | 1.23% | 2.16% | 0.73% | 2.10% | 1.34% | 2.90% | 1.21% | 2.42% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.59% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWY and XLE have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWY has higher volatility (25.64%) compared to XLE (7.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWY dropped -74.14% vs XLE's -71.26%.
On 10-year performance, EWY leads with 16.84% vs 9.91% for XLE. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLE has been the lower-risk option at 7.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWY has performed better with a 16.84% return vs 9.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWY.
XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 1.03% for EWY.
EWY is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while XLE is Energy Equities. EWY tracks MSCI Korea Index, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EWY and 0.08% for XLE.
EWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.29 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWY and XLE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer