PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWY vs. SILJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWY vs. SILJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWY achieves a 103.10% return, which is significantly higher than SILJ's -1.77% return. Over the past 10 years, EWY has outperformed SILJ with an annualized return of 16.84%, while SILJ has yielded a comparatively lower 8.82% annualized return.


EWY

1D
-0.75%
1M
10.39%
YTD
103.10%
6M
117.85%
1Y
203.95%
3Y*
46.46%
5Y*
18.80%
10Y*
16.84%

SILJ

1D
3.23%
1M
-17.41%
YTD
-1.77%
6M
0.26%
1Y
84.73%
3Y*
45.21%
5Y*
11.38%
10Y*
8.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWY vs. SILJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWY
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF
103.10%95.33%-20.48%19.05%-26.59%-7.58%39.43%7.97%-20.37%44.97%
SILJ
Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF
-1.77%183.89%6.39%-5.21%-15.42%-23.21%33.00%57.06%-27.95%-5.65%

Correlation

The correlation between EWY and SILJ is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2012

0.30

The correlation between EWY and SILJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (all time) to 0.44 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EWY vs. SILJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWY
SILJ

Technology

57.4%

-

Industrials

14.5%

-

Financial Services

9.7%
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

6.3%

-

Healthcare

3.1%

-

Communication Services

2.7%
0.0%

Basic Materials

2.5%
99.8%

Consumer Defensive

1.8%
0.2%

Energy

0.7%

-

Utilities

0.4%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

EWY
57.4%
SILJ

-

Industrials

EWY
14.5%
SILJ

-

Financial Services

EWY
9.7%
SILJ
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

EWY
6.3%
SILJ

-

Healthcare

EWY
3.1%
SILJ

-

Communication Services

EWY
2.7%
SILJ
0.0%

Basic Materials

EWY
2.5%
SILJ
99.8%

Consumer Defensive

EWY
1.8%
SILJ
0.2%

Energy

EWY
0.7%
SILJ

-

Utilities

EWY
0.4%
SILJ

-

Real Estate

EWY

-

SILJ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWY vs. SILJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWY
EWY Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
EWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWY Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
EWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWY Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

SILJ
SILJ Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SILJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SILJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
SILJ Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SILJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SILJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWY vs. SILJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EWYSILJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.26

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.65

2.19

+6.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

30.24

5.65

+24.58

EWY vs. SILJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWY Sharpe Ratio is 4.29, which is higher than the SILJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWY and SILJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EWY vs. SILJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWY drawdown since its inception was -74.14%, smaller than the maximum SILJ drawdown of -79.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWY and SILJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWYSILJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.14%

-79.04%

+4.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.08%

-39.16%

+16.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.36%

-39.16%

+11.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.55%

-53.55%

+5.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.73%

-70.06%

+20.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.88%

-32.56%

+23.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.11%

-41.40%

+21.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.59%

15.17%

-8.58%

Volatility

EWY vs. SILJ - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) has a higher volatility of 25.64% compared to Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) at 20.76%. This indicates that EWY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SILJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWYSILJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.64%

20.76%

+4.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.65%

47.36%

-4.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.51%

56.54%

-10.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.15%

44.76%

-14.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.06%

46.41%

-18.35%

EWY vs. SILJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWY has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than SILJ's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWY vs. SILJ - Dividend Comparison

EWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than SILJ's 2.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWY
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF
1.03%2.10%2.55%2.52%1.23%2.16%0.73%2.10%1.34%2.90%1.21%2.42%
SILJ
Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF
2.04%2.00%7.26%0.01%0.05%0.36%1.23%1.45%1.66%0.00%0.52%2.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWY and SILJ have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWY has higher volatility (25.64%) compared to SILJ (20.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWY dropped -74.14% vs SILJ's -79.04%.

On 10-year performance, EWY leads with 16.84% vs 8.82% for SILJ. On fees, EWY is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, SILJ has been the lower-risk option at 20.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWY has performed better with a 16.84% return vs 8.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWY is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for SILJ.

SILJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 1.03% for EWY.

EWY is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while SILJ is Silver. EWY tracks MSCI Korea Index, while SILJ tracks Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EWY and 0.69% for SILJ.

EWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.29 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWY and SILJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer