EWY vs. SILJ
EWY (iShares MSCI South Korea ETF) and SILJ (Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWY is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Korea Index, while SILJ is a Silver fund tracking the Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWY returned 16.84%/yr vs 8.82%/yr for SILJ. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EWY charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for SILJ.
Performance
EWY vs. SILJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWY achieves a 103.10% return, which is significantly higher than SILJ's -1.77% return. Over the past 10 years, EWY has outperformed SILJ with an annualized return of 16.84%, while SILJ has yielded a comparatively lower 8.82% annualized return.
EWY
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 10.39%
- YTD
- 103.10%
- 6M
- 117.85%
- 1Y
- 203.95%
- 3Y*
- 46.46%
- 5Y*
- 18.80%
- 10Y*
- 16.84%
SILJ
- 1D
- 3.23%
- 1M
- -17.41%
- YTD
- -1.77%
- 6M
- 0.26%
- 1Y
- 84.73%
- 3Y*
- 45.21%
- 5Y*
- 11.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.82%
EWY vs. SILJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 103.10% | 95.33% | -20.48% | 19.05% | -26.59% | -7.58% | 39.43% | 7.97% | -20.37% | 44.97% |
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | -1.77% | 183.89% | 6.39% | -5.21% | -15.42% | -23.21% | 33.00% | 57.06% | -27.95% | -5.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWY and SILJ is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2012 | 0.30 |
The correlation between EWY and SILJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (all time) to 0.44 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EWY vs. SILJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWY
SILJ
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
EWY
SILJ
-
Industrials
EWY
SILJ
-
Financial Services
EWY
SILJ
Consumer Cyclical
EWY
SILJ
-
Healthcare
EWY
SILJ
-
Communication Services
EWY
SILJ
Basic Materials
EWY
SILJ
Consumer Defensive
EWY
SILJ
Energy
EWY
SILJ
-
Utilities
EWY
SILJ
-
Real Estate
EWY
-
SILJ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWY vs. SILJ — Risk / Return Rank
EWY
SILJ
EWY vs. SILJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EWY | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.26 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.65 | 2.19 | +6.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.24 | 5.65 | +24.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EWY vs. SILJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWY drawdown since its inception was -74.14%, smaller than the maximum SILJ drawdown of -79.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWY and SILJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWY | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.14% | -79.04% | +4.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.08% | -39.16% | +16.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.36% | -39.16% | +11.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.55% | -53.55% | +5.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.73% | -70.06% | +20.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.88% | -32.56% | +23.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.11% | -41.40% | +21.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.59% | 15.17% | -8.58% |
Volatility
EWY vs. SILJ - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) has a higher volatility of 25.64% compared to Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) at 20.76%. This indicates that EWY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SILJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWY | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.64% | 20.76% | +4.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.65% | 47.36% | -4.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.51% | 56.54% | -10.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.15% | 44.76% | -14.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.06% | 46.41% | -18.35% |
EWY vs. SILJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWY has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than SILJ's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWY vs. SILJ - Dividend Comparison
EWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than SILJ's 2.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 1.03% | 2.10% | 2.55% | 2.52% | 1.23% | 2.16% | 0.73% | 2.10% | 1.34% | 2.90% | 1.21% | 2.42% |
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | 2.04% | 2.00% | 7.26% | 0.01% | 0.05% | 0.36% | 1.23% | 1.45% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 0.52% | 2.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWY and SILJ have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWY has higher volatility (25.64%) compared to SILJ (20.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWY dropped -74.14% vs SILJ's -79.04%.
On 10-year performance, EWY leads with 16.84% vs 8.82% for SILJ. On fees, EWY is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, SILJ has been the lower-risk option at 20.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWY has performed better with a 16.84% return vs 8.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWY is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for SILJ.
SILJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 1.03% for EWY.
EWY is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while SILJ is Silver. EWY tracks MSCI Korea Index, while SILJ tracks Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EWY and 0.69% for SILJ.
EWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.29 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWY and SILJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer