EWY vs. GVAL
EWY (iShares MSCI South Korea ETF) and GVAL (Cambria Global Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWY is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Korea Index, while GVAL is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Cambria. EWY is passively managed, while GVAL is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWY returned 16.84%/yr vs 11.46%/yr for GVAL. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EWY charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for GVAL.
Performance
EWY vs. GVAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWY achieves a 103.10% return, which is significantly higher than GVAL's 16.63% return. Over the past 10 years, EWY has outperformed GVAL with an annualized return of 16.84%, while GVAL has yielded a comparatively lower 11.46% annualized return.
EWY
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 3.64%
- YTD
- 103.10%
- 6M
- 117.85%
- 1Y
- 203.95%
- 3Y*
- 46.46%
- 5Y*
- 18.80%
- 10Y*
- 16.84%
GVAL
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- 3.88%
- YTD
- 16.63%
- 6M
- 18.08%
- 1Y
- 40.92%
- 3Y*
- 26.84%
- 5Y*
- 13.64%
- 10Y*
- 11.46%
EWY vs. GVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 103.10% | 95.33% | -20.48% | 19.05% | -26.59% | -7.58% | 39.43% | 7.97% | -20.37% | 44.97% |
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF | 16.63% | 55.87% | 2.59% | 13.30% | -7.98% | 10.70% | -8.51% | 17.24% | -14.30% | 29.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWY and GVAL is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2014 | 0.62 |
The correlation between EWY and GVAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
EWY vs. GVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWY
GVAL
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
EWY
GVAL
Industrials
EWY
GVAL
Financial Services
EWY
GVAL
Consumer Cyclical
EWY
GVAL
Healthcare
EWY
GVAL
-
Communication Services
EWY
GVAL
Basic Materials
EWY
GVAL
Consumer Defensive
EWY
GVAL
Energy
EWY
GVAL
Utilities
EWY
GVAL
Real Estate
EWY
-
GVAL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWY vs. GVAL — Risk / Return Rank
EWY
GVAL
EWY vs. GVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) and Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EWY | GVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.47 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.65 | 3.48 | +5.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.24 | 13.27 | +16.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EWY vs. GVAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWY drawdown since its inception was -74.14%, which is greater than GVAL's maximum drawdown of -46.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWY and GVAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWY | GVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.14% | -46.82% | -27.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.08% | -11.50% | -11.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.36% | -15.72% | -11.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.55% | -30.83% | -17.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.73% | -46.82% | -2.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.88% | 0.00% | -8.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.11% | -13.85% | -6.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.59% | 3.02% | +3.57% |
Volatility
EWY vs. GVAL - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) has a higher volatility of 25.64% compared to Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) at 6.00%. This indicates that EWY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GVAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWY | GVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.64% | 6.00% | +19.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.65% | 13.40% | +29.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.51% | 15.18% | +31.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.15% | 18.56% | +11.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.06% | 19.20% | +8.86% |
EWY vs. GVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWY has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than GVAL's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWY vs. GVAL - Dividend Comparison
EWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than GVAL's 2.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 1.03% | 2.10% | 2.55% | 2.52% | 1.23% | 2.16% | 0.73% | 2.10% | 1.34% | 2.90% | 1.21% | 2.42% |
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF | 2.77% | 2.93% | 4.75% | 6.12% | 5.05% | 2.97% | 1.90% | 2.84% | 4.65% | 2.00% | 2.54% | 2.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWY and GVAL have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWY has higher volatility (25.64%) compared to GVAL (6.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWY dropped -74.14% vs GVAL's -46.82%.
On 10-year performance, EWY leads with 16.84% vs 11.46% for GVAL. On fees, EWY is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, GVAL has been the lower-risk option at 6.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWY has performed better with a 16.84% return vs 11.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWY is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for GVAL.
GVAL has the higher dividend yield at 2.77%, compared with 1.03% for EWY.
EWY is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while GVAL is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EWY and 0.64% for GVAL.
EWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.29 vs 2.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWY and GVAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer