EWY vs. GDX
EWY (iShares MSCI South Korea ETF) and GDX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWY is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Korea Index, while GDX is a Gold fund tracking the NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWY returned 15.79%/yr vs 12.82%/yr for GDX. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EWY charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for GDX.
Performance
EWY vs. GDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWY achieves a 90.95% return, which is significantly higher than GDX's -8.28% return. Over the past 10 years, EWY has outperformed GDX with an annualized return of 15.79%, while GDX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.82% annualized return.
EWY
- 1D
- 5.96%
- 1M
- -2.40%
- YTD
- 90.95%
- 6M
- 99.65%
- 1Y
- 189.48%
- 3Y*
- 44.08%
- 5Y*
- 17.62%
- 10Y*
- 15.79%
GDX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -16.83%
- YTD
- -8.28%
- 6M
- 0.10%
- 1Y
- 53.51%
- 3Y*
- 37.89%
- 5Y*
- 17.28%
- 10Y*
- 12.82%
EWY vs. GDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 90.95% | 95.33% | -20.48% | 19.05% | -26.59% | -7.58% | 39.43% | 7.97% | -20.37% | 44.97% |
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | -8.28% | 154.77% | 10.63% | 9.98% | -9.01% | -9.52% | 23.66% | 39.84% | -8.77% | 11.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWY and GDX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2006 | 0.30 |
The correlation between EWY and GDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (10 years) to 0.40 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EWY vs. GDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWY
GDX
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
EWY
GDX
-
Industrials
EWY
GDX
-
Financial Services
EWY
GDX
-
Consumer Cyclical
EWY
GDX
-
Healthcare
EWY
GDX
-
Communication Services
EWY
GDX
-
Basic Materials
EWY
GDX
Consumer Defensive
EWY
GDX
-
Energy
EWY
GDX
-
Utilities
EWY
GDX
-
Real Estate
EWY
-
GDX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWY vs. GDX — Risk / Return Rank
EWY
GDX
EWY vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EWY | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.22 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.26 | 1.68 | +6.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 29.84 | 4.32 | +25.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EWY | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.23 | 1.16 | +3.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.47 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.35 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.12 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
EWY vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWY drawdown since its inception was -74.14%, smaller than the maximum GDX drawdown of -80.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWY and GDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWY | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.14% | -80.34% | +6.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.08% | -32.09% | +9.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.36% | -32.09% | +4.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.55% | -46.51% | -2.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.73% | -49.79% | +0.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.33% | -32.09% | +17.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.12% | -40.43% | +20.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.38% | 12.42% | -6.04% |
Volatility
EWY vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) has a higher volatility of 25.98% compared to VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) at 16.05%. This indicates that EWY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWY | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.98% | 16.05% | +9.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.23% | 38.61% | +2.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.13% | 46.36% | -1.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.70% | 36.61% | -6.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.83% | 37.27% | -9.44% |
EWY vs. GDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWY has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than GDX's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWY vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison
EWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, more than GDX's 0.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 1.10% | 2.10% | 2.55% | 2.52% | 1.23% | 2.16% | 0.73% | 2.10% | 1.34% | 2.90% | 1.21% | 2.42% |
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | 0.80% | 0.74% | 1.19% | 1.61% | 1.66% | 1.67% | 0.53% | 0.67% | 0.50% | 0.76% | 0.26% | 0.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWY and GDX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWY has higher volatility (25.98%) compared to GDX (16.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWY dropped -74.14% vs GDX's -80.34%.
On 10-year performance, EWY leads with 15.79% vs 12.82% for GDX. On fees, GDX is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, GDX has been the lower-risk option at 16.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWY has performed better with a 15.79% return vs 12.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GDX is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWY.
EWY has the higher dividend yield at 1.10%, compared with 0.80% for GDX.
EWY is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while GDX is Gold. EWY tracks MSCI Korea Index, while GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EWY and 0.51% for GDX.
EWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.23 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWY and GDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer