PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWY vs. DVYA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWY vs. DVYA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) and iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWY achieves a 119.05% return, which is significantly higher than DVYA's 13.35% return. Over the past 10 years, EWY has outperformed DVYA with an annualized return of 17.46%, while DVYA has yielded a comparatively lower 7.30% annualized return.


EWY

1D
-0.73%
1M
30.18%
YTD
119.05%
6M
134.13%
1Y
251.82%
3Y*
51.99%
5Y*
20.31%
10Y*
17.46%

DVYA

1D
-0.86%
1M
0.51%
YTD
13.35%
6M
13.63%
1Y
39.49%
3Y*
21.73%
5Y*
9.88%
10Y*
7.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWY vs. DVYA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWY
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF
119.05%95.33%-20.48%19.05%-26.59%-7.58%39.43%7.97%-20.37%44.97%
DVYA
iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF
13.35%30.22%6.05%13.75%-2.17%3.41%-9.61%14.70%-14.87%16.99%

Correlation

The correlation between EWY and DVYA is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2012

0.61

The correlation between EWY and DVYA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWY vs. DVYA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWY
DVYA

Technology

52.4%
1.6%

Industrials

20.4%
7.1%

Financial Services

9.6%
30.9%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
10.9%

Healthcare

3.5%
3.5%

Communication Services

2.9%
4.7%

Basic Materials

2.0%
16.1%

Consumer Defensive

1.7%
5.2%

Energy

1.4%
5.0%

Utilities

0.4%
4.5%

Real Estate

-

10.6%

Technology

EWY
52.4%
DVYA
1.6%

Industrials

EWY
20.4%
DVYA
7.1%

Financial Services

EWY
9.6%
DVYA
30.9%

Consumer Cyclical

EWY
5.7%
DVYA
10.9%

Healthcare

EWY
3.5%
DVYA
3.5%

Communication Services

EWY
2.9%
DVYA
4.7%

Basic Materials

EWY
2.0%
DVYA
16.1%

Consumer Defensive

EWY
1.7%
DVYA
5.2%

Energy

EWY
1.4%
DVYA
5.0%

Utilities

EWY
0.4%
DVYA
4.5%

Real Estate

EWY

-

DVYA
10.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWY vs. DVYA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWY
EWY Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
EWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWY Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
EWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWY Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

DVYA
DVYA Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
DVYA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DVYA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DVYA Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
DVYA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
DVYA Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWY vs. DVYA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) and iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWYDVYADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.74

1.53

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.99

4.59

+6.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

40.91

16.66

+24.25

EWY vs. DVYA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWY Sharpe Ratio is 6.02, which is higher than the DVYA Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWY and DVYA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWYDVYADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.02

3.05

+2.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.66

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.42

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.30

+0.03

Drawdowns

EWY vs. DVYA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWY drawdown since its inception was -74.14%, which is greater than DVYA's maximum drawdown of -45.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWY and DVYA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWYDVYADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.14%

-45.61%

-28.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.08%

-8.64%

-14.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.36%

-19.15%

-8.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.55%

-25.37%

-23.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.73%

-45.61%

-4.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.73%

-3.11%

+1.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.13%

-10.06%

-10.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.19%

2.38%

+3.81%

Volatility

EWY vs. DVYA - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) has a higher volatility of 20.32% compared to iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA) at 3.94%. This indicates that EWY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DVYA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWYDVYADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.32%

3.94%

+16.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.41%

10.44%

+26.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.10%

13.00%

+29.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.83%

15.08%

+13.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.37%

17.55%

+9.82%

EWY vs. DVYA - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWY has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than DVYA's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWY vs. DVYA - Dividend Comparison

EWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than DVYA's 4.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DVYA
iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF
4.33%4.71%5.97%6.48%7.29%5.81%3.66%5.52%6.24%4.74%4.79%5.33%
EWY
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF
0.96%2.10%2.55%2.52%1.23%2.16%0.73%2.10%1.34%2.90%1.21%2.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWY and DVYA have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWY has higher volatility (20.32%) compared to DVYA (3.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWY dropped -74.14% vs DVYA's -45.61%.

On 10-year performance, EWY leads with 17.46% vs 7.30% for DVYA. On fees, DVYA is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, DVYA has been the lower-risk option at 3.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWY has performed better with a 17.46% return vs 7.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DVYA is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWY.

DVYA has the higher dividend yield at 4.33%, compared with 0.96% for EWY.

EWY tracks MSCI Korea Index, while DVYA tracks Dow Jones Asia/Pacific Select Dividend 30 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EWY and 0.49% for DVYA.

EWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.02 vs 3.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWY and DVYA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer