EWY vs. DRAM
EWY (iShares MSCI South Korea ETF) and DRAM (Roundhill Memory ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWY is a South Korea Equities fund tracking the MSCI Korea Index, while DRAM is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. EWY is passively managed, while DRAM is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 means they have usually moved in the same direction. EWY charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DRAM.
Performance
EWY vs. DRAM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EWY
- 1D
- 2.00%
- 1M
- -11.05%
- 6M
- 32.51%
- YTD
- 64.82%
- 1Y
- 131.90%
- 3Y*
- 38.47%
- 5Y*
- 14.28%
- 10Y*
- 13.21%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.71%
DRAM
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- -15.67%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.29B | $4.47B | $3.58B | |
| $4.48B | $4.44B | $4.18B |
EWY vs. DRAM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 26.95% |
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF | 89.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWY and DRAM is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.94 |
EWY vs. DRAM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWY
DRAM
Technology
Industrials
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
EWY
DRAM
Industrials
EWY
DRAM
-
Financial Services
EWY
DRAM
Consumer Cyclical
EWY
DRAM
-
Healthcare
EWY
DRAM
-
Communication Services
EWY
DRAM
-
Basic Materials
EWY
DRAM
-
Consumer Defensive
EWY
DRAM
-
Energy
EWY
DRAM
-
Utilities
EWY
DRAM
-
Real Estate
EWY
-
DRAM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWY vs. DRAM — Risk / Return Rank
EWY
DRAM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EWY vs. DRAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EWY | DRAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.88 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.64 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EWY vs. DRAM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWY drawdown since its inception was -74.14%, which is greater than DRAM's maximum drawdown of -44.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWY and DRAM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWY | DRAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.14% | -44.44% | -29.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.15% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.90% | -36.66% | +9.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.10% | -10.81% | -9.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.71% | — | — |
Volatility
EWY vs. DRAM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWY | DRAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.12% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.88% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.30% | 100.35% | -46.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.79% | 100.35% | -67.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.39% | 100.35% | -70.96% |
EWY vs. DRAM - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWY has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than DRAM's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWY vs. DRAM - Dividend Comparison
EWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, while DRAM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 1.27% | 2.10% | 2.55% | 2.52% | 1.23% | 2.16% | 0.73% | 2.10% | 1.34% | 2.90% | 1.21% | 2.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, EWY and DRAM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, EWY is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EWY is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DRAM.
EWY has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.00% for DRAM.
EWY is categorized as South Korea Equities, while DRAM is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EWY and 0.65% for DRAM.
Find the right allocation for EWY and DRAM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer