PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWW vs. IVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWW vs. IVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Mexico ETF (EWW) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWW achieves a 12.62% return, which is significantly higher than IVV's 10.85% return. Over the past 10 years, EWW has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 7.35%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.54% annualized return.


EWW

1D
-1.26%
1M
3.21%
YTD
12.62%
6M
16.29%
1Y
34.15%
3Y*
12.42%
5Y*
13.49%
10Y*
7.35%

IVV

1D
-0.76%
1M
4.97%
YTD
10.85%
6M
10.87%
1Y
28.00%
3Y*
22.43%
5Y*
13.88%
10Y*
15.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWW vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWW
iShares MSCI Mexico ETF
12.62%53.65%-28.22%40.32%1.24%20.27%-3.06%12.64%-14.58%14.47%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
10.85%17.85%24.93%26.31%-18.16%28.76%18.40%31.07%-4.49%21.75%

Correlation

The correlation between EWW and IVV is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2000

0.61

The correlation between EWW and IVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (3 years) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EWW vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWW
IVV

Consumer Defensive

24.9%
4.9%

Basic Materials

23.7%
1.8%

Financial Services

18.1%
11.8%

Industrials

13.1%
8.3%

Communication Services

10.4%
11.2%

Real Estate

7.7%
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

1.4%
10.1%

Healthcare

0.5%
8.5%

Energy

-

3.5%

Technology

-

35.6%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Consumer Defensive

EWW
24.9%
IVV
4.9%

Basic Materials

EWW
23.7%
IVV
1.8%

Financial Services

EWW
18.1%
IVV
11.8%

Industrials

EWW
13.1%
IVV
8.3%

Communication Services

EWW
10.4%
IVV
11.2%

Real Estate

EWW
7.7%
IVV
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

EWW
1.4%
IVV
10.1%

Healthcare

EWW
0.5%
IVV
8.5%

Energy

EWW

-

IVV
3.5%

Technology

EWW

-

IVV
35.6%

Utilities

EWW

-

IVV
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWW vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWW
EWW Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
EWW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWW Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
EWW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWW Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWW vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Mexico ETF (EWW) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWWIVVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.62

2.39

-0.76

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.27

3.25

-0.98

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.43

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

3.17

-0.71

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.08

14.71

-5.63

EWW vs. IVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWW Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is lower than the IVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWW and IVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWWIVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62

2.39

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.83

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.86

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.45

-0.15

Drawdowns

EWW vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWW drawdown since its inception was -64.94%, which is greater than IVV's maximum drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWW and IVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWWIVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.94%

-55.25%

-9.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.98%

-8.89%

-5.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.17%

-18.75%

-12.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.17%

-24.53%

-6.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.62%

-33.90%

-19.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.88%

-0.76%

-3.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.52%

-10.78%

-7.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.77%

1.91%

+1.86%

Volatility

EWW vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Mexico ETF (EWW) has a higher volatility of 5.79% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 2.87%. This indicates that EWW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWWIVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.79%

2.87%

+2.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.75%

8.90%

+8.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.15%

11.80%

+9.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.51%

16.88%

+5.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.39%

18.05%

+7.34%

EWW vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWW has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWW vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison

EWW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.09%, more than IVV's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWW
iShares MSCI Mexico ETF
3.09%3.48%4.39%2.19%3.64%2.06%1.43%2.92%2.30%2.22%1.77%2.34%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.06%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWW and IVV have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWW has higher volatility (5.79%) compared to IVV (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWW dropped -64.94% vs IVV's -55.25%.

On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.54% vs 7.35% for EWW. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.54% return vs 7.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EWW.

EWW has the higher dividend yield at 3.09%, compared with 1.06% for IVV.

EWW is categorized as Latin America Equities, while IVV is S&P 500. EWW tracks MSCI Mexico IMI 25/50 Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EWW and 0.03% for IVV.

IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWW and IVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer