PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWW vs. EWY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWW vs. EWY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Mexico ETF (EWW) and iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWW achieves a 12.62% return, which is significantly lower than EWY's 119.05% return. Over the past 10 years, EWW has underperformed EWY with an annualized return of 7.35%, while EWY has yielded a comparatively higher 17.46% annualized return.


EWW

1D
-1.26%
1M
3.21%
YTD
12.62%
6M
16.29%
1Y
34.15%
3Y*
12.42%
5Y*
13.49%
10Y*
7.35%

EWY

1D
-0.73%
1M
30.18%
YTD
119.05%
6M
134.13%
1Y
251.82%
3Y*
51.99%
5Y*
20.31%
10Y*
17.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWW vs. EWY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWW
iShares MSCI Mexico ETF
12.62%53.65%-28.22%40.32%1.24%20.27%-3.06%12.64%-14.58%14.47%
EWY
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF
119.05%95.33%-20.48%19.05%-26.59%-7.58%39.43%7.97%-20.37%44.97%

Correlation

The correlation between EWW and EWY is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2000

0.55

The correlation between EWW and EWY shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EWW vs. EWY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWW
EWY

Consumer Defensive

24.9%
1.7%

Basic Materials

23.7%
2.0%

Financial Services

18.1%
9.6%

Industrials

13.1%
20.4%

Communication Services

10.4%
2.9%

Real Estate

7.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.4%
5.7%

Healthcare

0.5%
3.5%

Energy

-

1.4%

Technology

-

52.4%

Utilities

-

0.4%

Consumer Defensive

EWW
24.9%
EWY
1.7%

Basic Materials

EWW
23.7%
EWY
2.0%

Financial Services

EWW
18.1%
EWY
9.6%

Industrials

EWW
13.1%
EWY
20.4%

Communication Services

EWW
10.4%
EWY
2.9%

Real Estate

EWW
7.7%
EWY

-

Consumer Cyclical

EWW
1.4%
EWY
5.7%

Healthcare

EWW
0.5%
EWY
3.5%

Energy

EWW

-

EWY
1.4%

Technology

EWW

-

EWY
52.4%

Utilities

EWW

-

EWY
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWW vs. EWY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWW
EWW Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
EWW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWW Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
EWW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWW Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

EWY
EWY Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
EWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWY Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
EWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWY Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWW vs. EWY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Mexico ETF (EWW) and iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWWEWYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.74

-0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

10.99

-8.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.08

40.91

-31.83

EWW vs. EWY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWW Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is lower than the EWY Sharpe Ratio of 6.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWW and EWY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWWEWYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62

6.02

-4.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.71

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.64

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.33

-0.03

Drawdowns

EWW vs. EWY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWW drawdown since its inception was -64.94%, smaller than the maximum EWY drawdown of -74.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWW and EWY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWWEWYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.94%

-74.14%

+9.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.98%

-23.08%

+9.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.17%

-27.36%

-3.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.17%

-48.55%

+17.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.62%

-49.73%

-3.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.88%

-1.73%

-2.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.52%

-20.13%

+1.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.77%

6.19%

-2.42%

Volatility

EWW vs. EWY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Mexico ETF (EWW) is 5.79%, while iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) has a volatility of 20.32%. This indicates that EWW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWWEWYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.79%

20.32%

-14.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.75%

37.41%

-19.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.15%

42.10%

-20.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.51%

28.83%

-6.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.39%

27.37%

-1.98%

EWW vs. EWY - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWW has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than EWY's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWW vs. EWY - Dividend Comparison

EWW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.09%, more than EWY's 0.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWW
iShares MSCI Mexico ETF
3.09%3.48%4.39%2.19%3.64%2.06%1.43%2.92%2.30%2.22%1.77%2.34%
EWY
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF
0.96%2.10%2.55%2.52%1.23%2.16%0.73%2.10%1.34%2.90%1.21%2.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWW and EWY have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWY has higher volatility (20.32%) compared to EWW (5.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWW dropped -64.94% vs EWY's -74.14%.

On 10-year performance, EWY leads with 17.46% vs 7.35% for EWW. On fees, EWW is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EWW has been the lower-risk option at 5.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWY has performed better with a 17.46% return vs 7.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWW is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWY.

EWW has the higher dividend yield at 3.09%, compared with 0.96% for EWY.

EWW is categorized as Latin America Equities, while EWY is Asia Pacific Equities. EWW tracks MSCI Mexico IMI 25/50 Index, while EWY tracks MSCI Korea Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EWW and 0.59% for EWY.

EWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.02 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWW and EWY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer