EWW vs. AIA
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Mexico ETF (EWW) and iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA).
EWW and AIA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EWW is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Mexico IMI 25/50 Index. It was launched on Mar 12, 1996. AIA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Asia 50. It was launched on Nov 13, 2007. Both EWW and AIA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
EWW vs. AIA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EWW vs. AIA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWW iShares MSCI Mexico ETF | 8.51% | 53.65% | -28.22% | 40.32% | 1.24% | 20.27% | -3.06% | 12.64% | -14.58% | 14.47% |
AIA iShares Asia 50 ETF | 8.86% | 47.79% | 20.26% | 4.32% | -24.08% | -10.91% | 33.73% | 22.21% | -14.22% | 45.00% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EWW having a 8.51% return and AIA slightly higher at 8.86%. Over the past 10 years, EWW has underperformed AIA with an annualized return of 6.16%, while AIA has yielded a comparatively higher 11.82% annualized return.
EWW
- 1D
- 3.39%
- 1M
- -7.05%
- YTD
- 8.51%
- 6M
- 12.41%
- 1Y
- 53.18%
- 3Y*
- 11.73%
- 5Y*
- 14.55%
- 10Y*
- 6.16%
AIA
- 1D
- 3.98%
- 1M
- -10.06%
- YTD
- 8.86%
- 6M
- 14.17%
- 1Y
- 50.84%
- 3Y*
- 22.77%
- 5Y*
- 4.92%
- 10Y*
- 11.82%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EWW vs. AIA - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWW has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than AIA's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EWW vs. AIA — Risk / Return Rank
EWW
AIA
EWW vs. AIA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Mexico ETF (EWW) and iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EWW | AIA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.16 | 1.94 | +0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.80 | 2.53 | +0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.36 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.66 | 3.03 | +0.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.00 | 11.92 | +2.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EWW | AIA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.16 | 1.94 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.20 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | 0.51 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.25 | +0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between EWW and AIA is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
EWW vs. AIA - Dividend Comparison
EWW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, more than AIA's 2.30% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWW iShares MSCI Mexico ETF | 3.20% | 3.48% | 4.39% | 2.19% | 3.64% | 2.06% | 1.43% | 2.92% | 2.30% | 2.22% | 1.77% | 2.34% |
AIA iShares Asia 50 ETF | 2.30% | 2.50% | 2.78% | 2.07% | 2.59% | 1.54% | 1.11% | 2.24% | 2.49% | 1.45% | 2.29% | 2.88% |
Drawdowns
EWW vs. AIA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWW drawdown since its inception was -64.94%, which is greater than AIA's maximum drawdown of -60.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWW and AIA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWW | AIA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.94% | -60.89% | -4.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.98% | -16.68% | +2.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.17% | -51.12% | +19.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.62% | -54.64% | +1.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.39% | -10.73% | +3.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.61% | -16.82% | -1.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.66% | 4.24% | -0.58% |
Volatility
EWW vs. AIA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Mexico ETF (EWW) is 11.52%, while iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) has a volatility of 12.54%. This indicates that EWW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EWW | AIA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.52% | 12.54% | -1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.51% | 19.46% | -1.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.76% | 26.39% | -1.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.43% | 24.87% | -2.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.39% | 23.19% | +2.20% |