PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWUS vs. FLGR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWUS vs. FLGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI United Kingdom Small-Cap ETF (EWUS) and Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWUS achieves a 1.21% return, which is significantly higher than FLGR's 0.44% return.


EWUS

1D
-1.03%
1M
2.10%
YTD
1.21%
6M
5.28%
1Y
8.92%
3Y*
12.21%
5Y*
-0.15%
10Y*
3.77%

FLGR

1D
-1.91%
1M
3.04%
YTD
0.44%
6M
4.14%
1Y
3.18%
3Y*
17.60%
5Y*
6.45%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWUS vs. FLGR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWUS
iShares MSCI United Kingdom Small-Cap ETF
1.21%25.13%3.55%15.41%-31.19%12.55%-2.58%35.16%-20.16%4.20%
FLGR
Franklin FTSE Germany ETF
0.44%36.67%10.63%24.22%-21.96%5.40%12.11%19.99%-21.50%-0.27%

Correlation

The correlation between EWUS and FLGR is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017

0.73

The correlation between EWUS and FLGR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWUS vs. FLGR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWUS
FLGR

Financial Services

22.9%
21.7%

Industrials

20.7%
30.5%

Consumer Cyclical

14.6%
8.2%

Real Estate

10.1%
1.3%

Basic Materials

6.7%
5.9%

Communication Services

5.7%
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
1.4%

Technology

4.3%
13.9%

Energy

3.3%

-

Healthcare

3.2%
5.8%

Utilities

3.0%
5.0%

Financial Services

EWUS
22.9%
FLGR
21.7%

Industrials

EWUS
20.7%
FLGR
30.5%

Consumer Cyclical

EWUS
14.6%
FLGR
8.2%

Real Estate

EWUS
10.1%
FLGR
1.3%

Basic Materials

EWUS
6.7%
FLGR
5.9%

Communication Services

EWUS
5.7%
FLGR
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

EWUS
4.6%
FLGR
1.4%

Technology

EWUS
4.3%
FLGR
13.9%

Energy

EWUS
3.3%
FLGR

-

Healthcare

EWUS
3.2%
FLGR
5.8%

Utilities

EWUS
3.0%
FLGR
5.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWUS vs. FLGR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWUS
EWUS Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
EWUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWUS Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
EWUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWUS Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

FLGR
FLGR Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
FLGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLGR Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
FLGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLGR Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWUS vs. FLGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI United Kingdom Small-Cap ETF (EWUS) and Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWUSFLGRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.05

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.59

0.22

+0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.92

0.63

+1.29

EWUS vs. FLGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWUS Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is higher than the FLGR Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWUS and FLGR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWUSFLGRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

0.19

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

0.32

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.28

+0.02

Drawdowns

EWUS vs. FLGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWUS drawdown since its inception was -49.33%, which is greater than FLGR's maximum drawdown of -46.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWUS and FLGR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWUSFLGRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.33%

-46.21%

-3.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.21%

-14.44%

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.84%

-15.53%

-4.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.14%

-43.54%

-4.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.93%

-4.26%

-1.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.08%

-12.37%

-0.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.65%

5.03%

-0.38%

Volatility

EWUS vs. FLGR - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI United Kingdom Small-Cap ETF (EWUS) and Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR) have volatilities of 6.12% and 6.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWUSFLGRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.12%

6.23%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.52%

14.03%

+0.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.78%

17.18%

+0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.12%

20.26%

+0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.59%

21.43%

+1.16%

EWUS vs. FLGR - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWUS has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FLGR's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWUS vs. FLGR - Dividend Comparison

EWUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, more than FLGR's 1.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWUS
iShares MSCI United Kingdom Small-Cap ETF
3.55%3.59%3.67%2.88%2.03%3.54%1.97%2.59%3.53%2.61%3.18%2.85%
FLGR
Franklin FTSE Germany ETF
1.71%1.72%2.40%2.99%3.50%2.67%2.61%2.52%3.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWUS and FLGR have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLGR has higher volatility (6.23%) compared to EWUS (6.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWUS dropped -49.33% vs FLGR's -46.21%.

On 5-year performance, FLGR leads with 6.45% vs -0.15% for EWUS. On fees, FLGR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, EWUS has been the lower-risk option at 6.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLGR has performed better with a 6.45% return vs -0.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLGR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWUS.

EWUS has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 1.71% for FLGR.

EWUS tracks MSCI United Kingdom Small Cap Index, while FLGR tracks FTSE Germany RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EWUS and 0.09% for FLGR.

EWUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.50 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWUS and FLGR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer