EWUS vs. SCJ
EWUS (iShares MSCI United Kingdom Small-Cap ETF) and SCJ (iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWUS is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI United Kingdom Small Cap Index, while SCJ is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan Small Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWUS returned 4.97%/yr vs 7.94%/yr for SCJ. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EWUS charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for SCJ.
Performance
EWUS vs. SCJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWUS achieves a -0.31% return, which is significantly lower than SCJ's 14.43% return. Over the past 10 years, EWUS has underperformed SCJ with an annualized return of 4.97%, while SCJ has yielded a comparatively higher 7.94% annualized return.
EWUS
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- -3.03%
- YTD
- -0.31%
- 6M
- 0.01%
- 1Y
- 5.85%
- 3Y*
- 12.78%
- 5Y*
- 0.40%
- 10Y*
- 4.97%
SCJ
- 1D
- -1.98%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 14.43%
- 6M
- 14.21%
- 1Y
- 29.99%
- 3Y*
- 18.07%
- 5Y*
- 7.56%
- 10Y*
- 7.94%
EWUS vs. SCJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWUS iShares MSCI United Kingdom Small-Cap ETF | -0.31% | 25.13% | 3.55% | 15.41% | -31.19% | 12.55% | -2.58% | 35.16% | -20.16% | 32.17% |
SCJ iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF | 14.43% | 29.58% | 3.41% | 13.22% | -12.75% | -2.95% | 7.46% | 16.16% | -17.17% | 31.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWUS and SCJ is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2012 | 0.49 |
The correlation between EWUS and SCJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (all time) to 0.59 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EWUS vs. SCJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWUS
SCJ
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Energy
Healthcare
Utilities
Financial Services
EWUS
SCJ
Industrials
EWUS
SCJ
Consumer Cyclical
EWUS
SCJ
Real Estate
EWUS
SCJ
Communication Services
EWUS
SCJ
Basic Materials
EWUS
SCJ
Consumer Defensive
EWUS
SCJ
Technology
EWUS
SCJ
Energy
EWUS
SCJ
Healthcare
EWUS
SCJ
Utilities
EWUS
SCJ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWUS vs. SCJ — Risk / Return Rank
EWUS
SCJ
EWUS vs. SCJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI United Kingdom Small-Cap ETF (EWUS) and iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF (SCJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EWUS | SCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.32 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.39 | 2.48 | -2.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.22 | 8.30 | -7.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EWUS vs. SCJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWUS drawdown since its inception was -49.33%, which is greater than SCJ's maximum drawdown of -43.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWUS and SCJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWUS | SCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.33% | -43.52% | -5.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.21% | -12.17% | -3.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.84% | -12.43% | -7.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.14% | -33.25% | -14.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.33% | -38.87% | -10.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.35% | -1.98% | -5.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.05% | -10.36% | -2.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.82% | 3.62% | +1.20% |
Volatility
EWUS vs. SCJ - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI United Kingdom Small-Cap ETF (EWUS) and iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF (SCJ) have volatilities of 4.96% and 4.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWUS | SCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.96% | 4.97% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.97% | 13.57% | +1.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.14% | 16.49% | +1.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.17% | 15.87% | +5.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.92% | 16.27% | +5.65% |
EWUS vs. SCJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWUS has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SCJ's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWUS vs. SCJ - Dividend Comparison
EWUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, more than SCJ's 2.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWUS iShares MSCI United Kingdom Small-Cap ETF | 3.30% | 3.59% | 3.67% | 2.88% | 2.03% | 3.54% | 1.97% | 2.59% | 3.53% | 2.61% | 3.18% | 2.85% |
SCJ iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF | 2.80% | 3.14% | 1.79% | 1.99% | 1.18% | 1.87% | 0.89% | 1.85% | 1.44% | 1.45% | 2.73% | 1.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWUS and SCJ have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCJ has higher volatility (4.97%) compared to EWUS (4.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWUS dropped -49.33% vs SCJ's -43.52%.
On 10-year performance, SCJ leads with 7.94% vs 4.97% for EWUS. On fees, SCJ is cheaper at 0.49% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCJ has performed better with a 7.94% return vs 4.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCJ is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWUS.
EWUS has the higher dividend yield at 3.30%, compared with 2.80% for SCJ.
EWUS is categorized as Europe Equities, while SCJ is Japan Equities. EWUS tracks MSCI United Kingdom Small Cap Index, while SCJ tracks MSCI Japan Small Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EWUS and 0.49% for SCJ.
SCJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWUS and SCJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer