EWU vs. FLGR

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

EWU (iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF) and FLGR (Franklin FTSE Germany ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - EWU tracks the MSCI United Kingdom Index while FLGR tracks the FTSE Germany RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EWU returned 10.69%/yr vs 6.08%/yr for FLGR. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EWU charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLGR.

Performance

EWU vs. FLGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF (EWU) and Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWU achieves a 4.82% return, which is significantly higher than FLGR's -2.86% return.

EWU

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: -2.10%
• YTD: 4.82%
• 6M: 4.59%
• 1Y: 19.24%
• 3Y*: 16.85%
• 5Y*: 10.69%
• 10Y*: 8.60%

FLGR

• 1D: -1.28%
• 1M: -3.55%
• YTD: -2.86%
• 6M: -3.03%
• 1Y: -0.38%
• 3Y*: 16.15%
• 5Y*: 6.08%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWU vs. FLGR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EWU iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF	4.82%	34.95%	6.74%	12.40%	-4.39%	18.19%	-11.80%	21.29%	-14.30%	4.72%
FLGR Franklin FTSE Germany ETF	-2.86%	36.67%	10.63%	24.22%	-21.96%	5.40%	12.11%	19.99%	-21.50%	-0.16%

Correlation

The correlation between EWU and FLGR is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017	0.74

The correlation between EWU and FLGR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWU vs. FLGR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EWU	FLGR
Financial Services	25.7%	20.5%
Healthcare	14.5%	5.6%
Industrials	13.2%	29.9%
Consumer Defensive	13.1%	1.4%
Energy	11.6%	-
Basic Materials	9.5%	5.6%
Utilities	5.1%	4.5%
Consumer Cyclical	3.8%	8.7%
Communication Services	2.3%	6.4%
Technology	0.7%	16.1%
Real Estate	0.6%	1.2%

Return for Risk

EWU vs. FLGR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWU

EWU Risk / Return Rank: 42
EWU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
EWU Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
EWU Omega Ratio Rank: 38
EWU Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
EWU Martin Ratio Rank: 44

FLGR

FLGR Risk / Return Rank: 9
FLGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
FLGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
FLGR Omega Ratio Rank: 8
FLGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
FLGR Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWU vs. FLGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF (EWU) and Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EWU	FLGR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	-0.02	+1.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.91	0.09	+1.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.01	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.95	-0.03	+1.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.62	-0.07	+6.69

EWU vs. FLGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWU Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is higher than the FLGR Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWU and FLGR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EWU vs. FLGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWU drawdown since its inception was -63.99%, which is greater than FLGR's maximum drawdown of -46.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWU and FLGR.

Drawdown Indicators

	EWU	FLGR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.99%	-46.21%	-17.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.92%	-14.44%	+4.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.63%	-15.53%	+2.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.91%	-42.69%	+17.78%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.33%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.30%	-7.40%	+2.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.14%	-12.32%	-1.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.91%	5.17%	-2.26%

Volatility

EWU vs. FLGR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF (EWU) is 4.02%, while Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR) has a volatility of 5.40%. This indicates that EWU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EWU	FLGR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.02%	5.40%	-1.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.56%	14.60%	-2.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.68%	17.51%	-2.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.43%	20.32%	-3.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.35%	21.41%	-3.06%

EWU vs. FLGR - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWU has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FLGR's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

EWU vs. FLGR - Dividend Comparison

EWU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, more than FLGR's 0.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EWU iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF	3.29%	3.73%	4.16%	4.14%	3.43%	4.35%	2.48%	4.13%	4.98%	3.91%	3.97%	4.11%
FLGR Franklin FTSE Germany ETF	0.33%	1.72%	2.40%	2.99%	3.50%	2.67%	2.61%	2.52%	3.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EWU and FLGR in my portfolio?

EWU and FLGR have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EWU or FLGR?

FLGR has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to EWU (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWU dropped -63.99% vs FLGR's -46.21%.

Which ETF is better, EWU or FLGR?

On 5-year performance, EWU leads with 10.69% vs 6.08% for FLGR. On fees, FLGR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, EWU has been the lower-risk option at 4.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EWU or FLGR?

Over the 5-year period, EWU has performed better with a 10.69% return vs 6.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EWU or FLGR?

FLGR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EWU or FLGR?

EWU has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 0.33% for FLGR.

What is the main difference between EWU and FLGR?

EWU tracks MSCI United Kingdom Index, while FLGR tracks FTSE Germany RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWU and 0.09% for FLGR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EWU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.